On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 12:01 AM, Aleksander Morgado
wrote:
>>
>> I overlooked one thing when I revised the patches based on Dan's
>> suggestion, and also missed that in my testing :-(
>>
>> MMSimMbim:update_modem_unlock_retries() calls
>> mm_iface_modem_update_unlock_retries() to report remainin
>
> I overlooked one thing when I revised the patches based on Dan's
> suggestion, and also missed that in my testing :-(
>
> MMSimMbim:update_modem_unlock_retries() calls
> mm_iface_modem_update_unlock_retries() to report remaining attempts
> PIN1. That won't affect MMBroadbandModemMbimPriv::sim
Hi Dan and Aleksander,
I overlooked one thing when I revised the patches based on Dan's
suggestion, and also missed that in my testing :-(
MMSimMbim:update_modem_unlock_retries() calls
mm_iface_modem_update_unlock_retries() to report remaining attempts
PIN1. That won't affect MMBroadbandModemMb
On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 1:02 AM, Ben Chan wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 3:34 PM, Aleksander Morgado
> wrote:
> However, we may be able to improve the situation a bit when MM is
> running by making mm_iface_modem_update_lock_info preserve what we
> have learned from a prior MBIM_CID
On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 3:34 PM, Aleksander Morgado
wrote:
However, we may be able to improve the situation a bit when MM is
running by making mm_iface_modem_update_lock_info preserve what we
have learned from a prior MBIM_CID_PIN response. That's what I'm
trying to address wi
On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 11:09 AM, Aleksander Morgado
wrote:
> Hey,
>
>>>
>>> Hum... looks like the patched logic is actually way more confusing
>>> than the original one... See attached logs (the -patched file is after
>>> your changes).
>>>
>>
>> Thanks for taking time to test the patch set. I s
Hey,
>>
>> Hum... looks like the patched logic is actually way more confusing
>> than the original one... See attached logs (the -patched file is after
>> your changes).
>>
>
> Thanks for taking time to test the patch set. I should keep calling
> the carrier to get a PUK code...
>
:)
> Do you b
On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 2:28 AM, Aleksander Morgado
wrote:
>
> Hey
>
> Hum... looks like the patched logic is actually way more confusing
> than the original one... See attached logs (the -patched file is after
> your changes).
>
Thanks for taking time to test the patch set. I should keep callin
Hey
> It really is unfortunate that the MBIM_CID_PIN query only reports the
> information of the "currently applicable" PIN type, although the truth
> is that that's the only useful one.
Yes, indeed. It would have been much better if MBIM_CID_PIN query
could take a PIN t
It really is unfortunate that the MBIM_CID_PIN query only reports the
information of the "currently applicable" PIN type, although the truth
is that that's the only useful one.
>>>
>>> Yes, indeed. It would have been much better if MBIM_CID_PIN query
>>> could take a PIN type as argu
On Tue, Aug 8, 2017 at 11:15 AM, Aleksander Morgado
wrote:
> Hey,
>
>>> It really is unfortunate that the MBIM_CID_PIN query only reports the
>>> information of the "currently applicable" PIN type, although the truth
>>> is that that's the only useful one.
>>
>> Yes, indeed. It would have been muc
Hey,
>> It really is unfortunate that the MBIM_CID_PIN query only reports the
>> information of the "currently applicable" PIN type, although the truth
>> is that that's the only useful one.
>
> Yes, indeed. It would have been much better if MBIM_CID_PIN query
> could take a PIN type as argument.
On Tue, Aug 8, 2017 at 12:43 AM, Aleksander Morgado
wrote:
> Hey,
>
> It really is unfortunate that the MBIM_CID_PIN query only reports the
> information of the "currently applicable" PIN type, although the truth
> is that that's the only useful one.
Yes, indeed. It would have been much better if
Hey,
On Tue, Aug 8, 2017 at 1:06 AM, Ben Chan wrote:
> This branch contains a series of patches to address the following
> issue observed on MBIM modems:
>
> After MMSimMbim performs a MBIM_CID_PIN set operation, it calls
> mm_iface_modem_update_lock_info() (through its base class MMBaseSim)
> to
This branch contains a series of patches to address the following
issue observed on MBIM modems:
After MMSimMbim performs a MBIM_CID_PIN set operation, it calls
mm_iface_modem_update_lock_info() (through its base class MMBaseSim)
to refresh the unlock retries information, which results in a
MBIM_C
15 matches
Mail list logo
