Re: [MMouse]: contract (is not the issue)

2000-02-12 Thread jsl04
Okay, excuse me if I misconstrue the whole bottom line of this discussion. (Ah, but how could I?!) Yr raising a cloud of verbiage (not to mention taxing yr intellectual, logic-based stock-pile) over what boils down to cashola vs art. Just look at that interesting vocabulary you use, all in

[MMouse]: contract

2000-02-11 Thread Philip Smoker
Well, Bill, you seem to be awfully knowledgable about the music business. Perhaps you could explain to me the inherent exclusivity clause in the band's contract. And maybe you could also explain to me exactly where you get all of these cold hard facts about the record-buying public. I

Re: [MMouse]: contract (is not the issue)

2000-02-11 Thread Bill, Wright
it's obvious that my discussion is being ignored as witnessed by the following statements and replies. Further, others simply solve this issue with "witty" and immature comments. Thus, I think this discussion serves no purpose any longer (especially on the list). However, my original

Re: [MMouse]: contract (is not the issue)

2000-02-11 Thread Russ Sweetser
hot damn leave me out of your philosophical catfight. if you have to, use "that guy with the mp3s" or "random mp3 guy" or something. :D? kool and the gang? russ 1) I never claimed russ had the singles on mp3, just suggested that they from Russ, now is it? You're not going to find