K a t e M e r c i e r <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: [MMouse]: the whole baby (cum) angels thing
>Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2000 14:12:39 -0700 (PDT)
>
>you wrote:
>
> >These contain at least one suprise for me...
> >
> >"baby cum angel
oops... I just replied to the original post saying pretty much the same
thing. Sorry.
- Original Message -
From: "K a t e M e r c i e r" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, June 26, 2000 5:12 PM
Subject: [MMouse]: the whole baby (cum) ange
ROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, June 26, 2000 2:12 PM
Subject: [MMouse]: the whole baby (cum) angels thing
> you wrote:
>
> >These contain at least one suprise for me...
> >
> >"baby cum angels fly around you"
> >
> >Who kn
cum (km, km)
prep.
Together with; plus. Often used in combination: our attic-cum-studio.
[Latin; see kom in Indo-European Roots.]
you wrote:
>These contain at least one suprise for me...
>
>"baby cum angels fly around you"
>
>Who knew?
and, while i agree that the epic liner notes could have used some
proofing, it COULD be "baby(s)-cum-angels fly around you" although
it's a little stiff it's essentially saying the same thin
