At 16:03 02.07.2002, you wrote:
On Tue, 2 Jul 2002, Per Einar Ellefsen wrote:
Banners are now online!!
We received banners from 3 persons, and they will all represent
mod_perl :)
However, if you have any new ideas and a little time, you are very welcome
to send in more banners, we
Valerio_Valdez Paolini [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I never used RH RPMs for Apache and mod_perl, mostly because of DSO
issues.
I'm running stock RH RPM apache/mod_perl on some fairly hairy sites
(hand-crafted mod_perl, slashcode etc.) with _no_ problems. And that
was through the current round
John,
I had run 'perl Makefile.PL' in mod_perl-1.26. It even generated the
required makefiles.
When I run a gmake, it tries to use 'gcc'.
I am thankful for your assistance and help.
Chandra.
-Original Message-
From: John Arnold [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:
Hi,
Socket read on 8 for length failed : Bad file descriptor
Has anyone seen this error message in his httpd error log?
The DB statement fails and SQL server goes away. I'm (trying to) using
mod_perl and guessing that this problem has something to do with flushing
DB handles, but where do you
Hi,
I'm currently looking for a Perl / mod_perl programmer to help
developing our application MKDoc.
The application was originally a CGI script which has been made
Apache::Registry friendly later on. We are currently gradually porting
the software under proper mod_perl handlers.
I've just updated the mod_perl with the latest stats and I'm glad to say
that the results are nice, so you can show your bosses that they did the
right choice (or should) ;)
This is the netcraft.com:
http://perl.apache.org/release/outstanding/stats/netcraft.html
and this is
On Wed, Jul 03, 2002 at 02:41:38PM +0100, Peter Haworth wrote:
On Wed, 3 Jul 2002 11:40:44 +0100, Jean-Michel Hiver wrote:
perl: Any iussues with perl/modperl? Besides modperl I will be running a
perl application with a few hundred thousend lines of code...
Wow. For reference last time
On Fri, 05 Jul 2002 01:18:46 +0800 Stas Bekman wrote:
I've just updated the mod_perl with the latest stats and I'm glad to
say that the results are nice, so you can show your bosses that they
did the right choice (or should) ;)
Any ideas on what caused such a huge jump in usage? Besides the
Hello all,
This is perhaps an apahce uri translation problem but:
I am having a path_info problem...
Synopsis.
Location /
SetHandler perl-script
PerlHandler Module
/Location
Module.pm returns $r-path_info() in html to client.
url: 'www.host/' returns '/'
url:
Michael A Nachbaur wrote:
On Fri, 05 Jul 2002 01:18:46 +0800 Stas Bekman wrote:
I've just updated the mod_perl with the latest stats and I'm glad to
say that the results are nice, so you can show your bosses that they
did the right choice (or should) ;)
Any ideas on what caused such a
On Thu, Jul 04, 2002 at 07:06:30AM -0700, Nick Tonkin wrote:
I'm confused. Since when did bloat surpass elegance as a measure of
success in Perl programming?
:-)
I think it was more of a joke ... or at least primitive Perl
programmer willy-waving ..
Rich.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | Is your
hi,
apache uses a simple technique for determining the path_info. it starts
at your document root and looks for the directory you specified in your
URI. it continues to go deeper in the directory structure until it
encounters a directory(or file) that doesn't exist. when this happens
the the
On Thu, 4 Jul 2002, Wes Cravens wrote:
url: 'www.host/' returns '/'
url: 'www.host/debug' returns '' when I was expecting '/debug'
does a file or directory named 'debug' exist in your document root?
If so, it's normal. It is also possible that you are doing an error
I made many times :) You
I'm confused. Since when did bloat surpass elegance as a measure of
success in Perl programming?
- nick
Nick Tonkin {|8^)
On Thu, 4 Jul 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Jul 03, 2002 at 02:41:38PM +0100, Peter Haworth wrote:
On Wed, 3 Jul 2002 11:40:44
Nick Tonkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'm confused. Since when did bloat surpass elegance as a measure of
success in Perl programming?
Indeed. Generic question: How many lines of code have you spent today?
--
Frank Cringle, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
voice: (+49 7745) 928759; fax: 928761
Ok... I can see this.
The piece of the puzzle that I am missing is why it behaves differently for
/ than for /stuff.
I have taken out the Directory / information. I would have thought that
when Apache saw
www.host/stuff and there was no 'physical' stuff than it would pass /stuff
as path_info
Hi folks,
I use the following modperl script to control page
access, based on a sessionid held in a cookie. A
database is queried to get the user id from the db
based on the cookie value. (No cookie, and your
bounced to the logon screen).
So far so good, and all works well. Except for one
user
Not sure but I would try changing the query:
my $sth = $dbh-prepare(
SELECT id from session
WHERE field = ?
);
$sth-bind_param( 1, $SessionID );
$sth-execute;
That might help.
-Original Message-
From:
Levon,
Thanks for the swift reply - but nope - no different.
--- Levon Barker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Not sure
but I would try changing the query:
my $sth = $dbh-prepare(
SELECT id from session
WHERE field = ?
);
I'm currently looking for a Perl / mod_perl programmer to help
developing our application MKDoc.
Just a quick reminder Jean-Michel - have you posted this on
jobs.perl.org? I only asked because UK jobs are few and far between on
there.
Jonathan M. Hollin
WYPUG
http://wypug.pm.org/
Jason Wilkes wrote:
So far so good, and all works well. Except for one
user id (actually id=333), which causes an internal
server error. If I put print debugging lines in -
everything works (even for user 333). If I take them
out again all other users work fine except 333.
Can anybody throw
21 matches
Mail list logo
