Hey,
The Apache Hello World benchmarks are updated at
http://chamas.com/bench/
The changes that affect performance numbers include:
Set MaxRequestsPerChild to 1000 globally for more realistic run.
Set MaxRequestsPerChild to 100 for applications that seem to leak
memory which inclu
This release is all about bug fixes. Basically, <%filter> blocks have
been a bit borked in various ways (different in different releases) since
1.10, and now they should be in good shape.
There were a number of test failures reported over the past several
releases, almost of which were actually
We talked about this limiation of the dual setup before. There is no
solution publically available. But you can try this:
1) check http://modperl.home.att.net or similar cookie-based ticketing
system.
2) write a "ticket-client" module in C and load it into the proxy server (I
have one based on lib
I started using a dynamic @INC (set up in a TransHandler), and discovered
that Apache::Reload (v0.07) was not doing its job correctly in that case.
Note, changing @INC in a transhandler won't have the desired Apache::Reload
effects unless the PerlInitHandler for Apache::Reload is placed in a
sec
*They* don't know what they mean, but we're getting a variance for Perl
(supposedly). No such luck for mysql or apache
--- Lupe Christoph <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wednesday, 2002-10-09 at 18:22:24 -0400, Steve Grazzini wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 09, 2002 at 02:43:18PM -0700, Paul wrote:
> Is there a way to do this so that access to the file
> would be _impossible_ unless the user is authenticated
> by the mod-perl server? I am looking for a solution
> that can guarantee that there is no way to circumvent
> the authentication process. I can think of solutions
> where the probabil
Suppose I have a typical proxied mod-perl setup and I
have a large (~ 650 MB) file I'd like to provide
authenticated access to. The mod-perl server will be
doing the authentication, but for performance
considerations I'd like the proxy server to serve the
file directly instead of having the mod-p
> $VAR1 = {
>'LastScreen' => [
> '/MR-@0,324,',
> '/MR-@0,324,'
>],
>'Subject' => [
> 'Blah blah blah',
> 'Blah blah blah'
>],
>'Message' => [
> '‘blah blah’ blah blah ‘blah blah’ blah.',
> '<91>blah blah<92> blah blah <91>blah blah<92>blah.'
>
Hi,
Here is the kind of thing that is driving me nuts. Please see:
http://perl.apache.org/docs/general/perl_reference/perl_reference.html#Remed
ies_for_Inner_Subroutines
If what this says is true, then either I don't have a closure type problem,
or else what is says isn't true. It says that
if
On Saturday, 2002-10-12 at 11:50:12 +0100, Dave Hodgkinson wrote:
> Todd Finney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Over here, the barometer looks like:
For what it's worth, here is the major Freelancer/Professional Services
site in Germany:
http://www.gulp.de/kb/tools/gulpometer.html
If you want
Just wondering if anyone has seen this problem before, or has a general
solution to it. Basically what we see, is that with some submitted forms,
usually with 8 bit data, the POST parameters passed become 'doubled'. The
problem is that we have a loop like this to gather out all the parameters
earl
Hi there,
On Sat, 12 Oct 2002, Michael Grant wrote:
> I did this and it still doesn't reload the script.
>
> I added it just after the LoadModule:
>
> LoadModule perl_modulelibexec/apache/libperl.so
> PerlInitHandler Apache::StatINC
>
> It's a single main script, not a module.
Have
On Wednesday, 2002-10-09 at 18:22:24 -0400, Steve Grazzini wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 09, 2002 at 02:43:18PM -0700, Paul wrote:
> > The company is making us migrate (some baloney about being legally
> > vulnerable because we're using open source)
> If they won't let you use open-source tools, then the
FYI: MS Windows .NET server (which is the XP server equivalent) is available
for beta. Find out at windowsbeta.microsoft.com
Issac
- Original Message -
From: "Adam Nelson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'Ken Y. Clark'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, October 11, 2002
On Thu, 10 Oct 2002, Ask Bjoern Hansen wrote:
> On Fri, 6 Sep 2002, [iso-8859-2] Tomá¹ Procházka wrote:
>
> > Problem: Sometimes, although user entered correct password, is
> > authentication rejected. I tried logging values of $real_pass and
> > $test_pass and they differed. When I add line
>
>
15 matches
Mail list logo
