stas2003/02/02 17:18:15
Modified:lib/ModPerl Code.pm
Log:
fix the indentation for the autogenerated files
Revision ChangesPath
1.90 +1 -1 modperl-2.0/lib/ModPerl/Code.pm
Index: Code.pm
stas2003/02/02 22:40:33
Modified:.Changes
src/modules/perl modperl_config.c
Added: t/hooks cleanup.t
t/hooks/TestHooks cleanup.pm
Log:
PerlCleanupHandler implementation + tests
Revision ChangesPath
1.119 +8 -1
Hi there,
On Sun, 2 Feb 2003, David Dick wrote:
Got a bit of a weird set of behaviour with a mod_perl Apache::Registry
type script.
[snip]
More information about this error may be available
in the server error log.P
[snip]
Anyone got any ideas?
What does it say in the error_log?
73,
Ged.
Good Point. Forgot to mention that the error log is completely empty. :)
Ged Haywood wrote:
Hi there,
On Sun, 2 Feb 2003, David Dick wrote:
Got a bit of a weird set of behaviour with a mod_perl Apache::Registry
type script.
[snip]
More information about this error may be
Version 3.0 of CGI::Application is now available via CPAN!
Download site for CGI::Application:
http://www.cpan.org/authors/id/J/JE/JERLBAUM/
CHANGES SINCE VERSION 2.5:
- Changed the run() method to use Perl's built-in dynamic method
call for all run modes, whether by name or by code ref.
Hi Stas,
Thanks for your reply.
The file perms are correct and nothing is printed to the logs.
The scripts do run. If you write a script with a redirect in it
for instance, the redirect is made. They just don't seem to
print anything to stdout.
Regards, George Savvides.
Stas Bekman wrote:
Hi there,
On Sun, 2 Feb 2003, David Dick wrote:
Forgot to mention that the error log is completely empty. :)
Are you getting core dumps?
73,
Ged.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: MD5
Hi George,
I've not seen any of this thread other than what's
below, but have you had all the headers output correctly?
Try running this after setting $url, and see what you get:
use LWP::UserAgent;
$url = http://195.117.126.24;;
$ua =
not even getting a broken connection. So somehow mod_perl doesn't
_really_ think it's an error.
Ged Haywood wrote:
Hi there,
On Sun, 2 Feb 2003, David Dick wrote:
Forgot to mention that the error log is completely empty. :)
Are you getting core dumps?
73,
Ged.
Hi again,
On Mon, 3 Feb 2003, David Dick wrote:
not even getting a broken connection. So somehow mod_perl doesn't
_really_ think it's an error.
Check out DEBUGGING in 'perldoc Apache::Registry'.
Apache::Registry won't always return what you'd think it should.
This has snookered more than
Iñaki Martínez wrote:
Hi!!!
Well this is my firts post in this list...
I have a server with several domains which each of them has its own
handlers, subroutines and there are several common subrutines.
What i want to do it is organize the directory structure, so:
Version 0.10 of Apache::PAR is now available on CPAN at the following
location:
http://www.cpan.org/authors/id/N/NB/NBYRD/
This version of Apache::PAR now includes preliminary support for both
mod_perl 1.x and 2.x environments natively (without Apache::compat).
Note, however, this does not
Nathan Byrd wrote:
Version 0.10 of Apache::PAR is now available on CPAN at the following
location:
http://www.cpan.org/authors/id/N/NB/NBYRD/
This version of Apache::PAR now includes preliminary support for both
mod_perl 1.x and 2.x environments natively (without Apache::compat).
Note,
On Sun, 2003-02-02 at 21:04, Stas Bekman wrote:
Nathan Byrd wrote:
Version 0.10 of Apache::PAR is now available on CPAN at the following
location:
http://www.cpan.org/authors/id/N/NB/NBYRD/
This version of Apache::PAR now includes preliminary support for both
mod_perl 1.x and 2.x
All,
To begin with, should proposed mod_perl patches go to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]? The documentation seemed a little unclear in this
case (I decided to play it safe since I didn't run across any messages
on the dev list from outside developers.)
When I was converting Apache::PAR to work with
Nathan Byrd wrote:
All,
To begin with, should proposed mod_perl patches go to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]? The documentation seemed a little unclear in this
case (I decided to play it safe since I didn't run across any messages
on the dev list from outside developers.)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] would be the
16 matches
Mail list logo