Re: apache 1.3.26 reverse proxy

2002-07-01 Thread E Kolve
lients for mod_perl) were in "W". This seems like a problem with either the IOBufferSize that was recently added or possibly something to do with the proxy not releasing the mod_perl process once it has gotten the last byte... --eric David Dyer-Bennet wrote: > E Kolve <

apache 1.3.26 reverse proxy

2002-07-01 Thread E Kolve
Has anyone noticed any performance problems using 1.3.26 as the front end proxy to a backend mod_perl server? I upgraded a box running apache 1.3.22 as the frontend proxy to 1.3.26. Prior to upgrading the load was ~2.0 - 3.0. After upgrading, the load went up to around 21 - 25. I then downg

Re: Fascinating segfault at Apache startup

2002-06-21 Thread E Kolve
I got this error and spent a bit of time trying to figure it out. The reason I was getting it was that I had started with a RedHat 7.2 system which comes with Perl 5.6.0 and upgraded to 5.6.1 using RH 7.3 RPMS. I then compiled mod_perl against 5.6.1. Each time I started up I got the absurdfo