MP1, Redhat 7.3: Transmission size limited after some time

2003-07-03 Thread Gerd Knops
Hi all, I got a really odd problem: I have identical mod_perl/apache installs on FreeBSD 3.x systems and a few Redhat 7.3 systems. After some time running OK, the Redhat systems start acting up. Transmissions are suddenly cut of after somewhere between 90 and 150 kb. Absolutely nothing in any

[OT] Better Linux server platform: Redhat or SuSe?

2002-07-02 Thread Gerd Knops
Hi, Sorry for this somewhat OT post (though it may be of general interest). I am currently maintaining a WAN (4 continents) consisting of FreeBSD machines. While I am quite happy with FreeBSD, lack of driver support for some boards I need to use forces me to switch to Linux. And while the Pros

Re: Apache/mod_perl

2000-07-07 Thread Gerd Knops
Scott Alexander wrote: > So if i didn't want to wait, how would I go about getting an RSA > liscense? to have a mod_ssl server before then. > > Also, are the CA's willing to sign for this time of server? > When I checked into this Raven SSL seemed to be the solution. It is basically mod_ssl wi

Re: Perl vs Java [Now OT]

2000-06-11 Thread Gerd Knops
dreamwvr wrote: > hi Gerd, > that was very much what i was looking for! hmm.. seems that perl is > definately one of the most mem efficient langs whereas java is not. > cool and definately great reading although "talk about detail!" this > is good! Java has become acceptable for a compiled languag

Re: Perl vs Java

2000-06-11 Thread Gerd Knops
dreamwvr wrote: > hi, > this could be a can of worms but anyhow here goes. Has anyone timed > the actual efficiency of Perl vs Java? > > [cut] > I found this of some interest: Computer Languages compared http://wwwipd.ira.uka.de/%7Eprechelt/documents/jccpp_tr.pdf Gerd

Re: [RFC] Do Not Run Everything on One mod_perl Server

2000-04-19 Thread Gerd Knops
Stas Bekman wrote: > On Wed, 19 Apr 2000, Matt Carothers wrote: > > On Tue, 18 Apr 2000, Stas Bekman wrote: > > > > > Let's assume that you have two different sets of scripts/code > > > which have a little or nothing in common at all (different > > > modules, no base code sharing), the basic mod_p

Re: vcpan (Virtual CPAN) ?

2000-04-12 Thread Gerd Knops
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > This site looks on top of it! > To bad they are a Verio company. My recent experiences with Verio have been extremely poor, their customer support for leased lines is that it pretty much is non-existent. Gerd > I noticed they were using a wrapper > called vcpan for ac

Re: Killing a child process

1999-12-17 Thread Gerd Knops
Bill Moseley wrote: > If running a program with a fork/exec within a mod_perl handler (not the > best thing to do in mod_perl) with the following code: > > my $pid = open( PROG, "-|" ); > > if ($pid) { > while () { > [..] > } > close( PROG ) or log_message( "failed close on program $! $?"); > > Wh

IPC::ShareLite? [was Re: MOD_PERL question]

1999-10-02 Thread Gerd Knops
Doug MacEachern wrote: > > I have the feeling IPC::Shareable is no longer supported. have you tried > swaping it for IPC::ShareLite? > I checked CPAN and can't find IPC::ShareLite. Where is it hiding? Thanks Gerd