Hi all,
On Mon, 8 Jul 2002, Owen Scott Medd wrote:
On Mon, 8 Jul 2002, Ganesan M wrote:
Schoolmaster.net, 167,000 lines of Perl code, another 30,000 lines of C.
Rich.
How do you run 'C' code from Apache/mod_perl?
Using the perl XS interface usually... that's how we access
From: Ged Haywood [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi all,
On Mon, 8 Jul 2002, Owen Scott Medd wrote:
How do you run 'C' code from Apache/mod_perl?
Using the perl XS interface usually... that's how we access our text
analysis routines which are in C.
Or use Inline.pm if you don't want to get too
How do you run 'C' code from Apache/mod_perl?
Oops. I forgot to include the error message.
inlinetest_pl_c800.xs: In function `myfunction':
inlinetest_pl_c800.xs:24: request for member `pointer_status' in something
not a structure or union
G.
Owen, if you could give me any location/documentation/tutorial for
how to use perlXS interface efficiently to access C progs, that will
be great.
You might also want to take a look at SWIG (a search for 'SWIG' on
google will do as ususal), which looks quite interesting... it's a shame
that
Schoolmaster.net, 167,000 lines of Perl code, another 30,000 lines of C.
Rich.
How do you run 'C' code from Apache/mod_perl?
G.
On Mon, 8 Jul 2002, Ganesan M wrote:
Schoolmaster.net, 167,000 lines of Perl code, another 30,000 lines of C.
Rich.
How do you run 'C' code from Apache/mod_perl?
Using the perl XS interface usually... that's how we access our text
analysis routines which are in C.
Owen
--
USMail:
I think the point is that you have complete non-trivial applications being
written in Perl.
Success is measured in application adoption, not in elegance. I've
worked many places that produced very elegant code, however all of those
places no longer exist. You need more than cool code to
Valerio_Valdez Paolini [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I never used RH RPMs for Apache and mod_perl, mostly because of DSO
issues.
I'm running stock RH RPM apache/mod_perl on some fairly hairy sites
(hand-crafted mod_perl, slashcode etc.) with _no_ problems. And that
was through the current round
On Wed, Jul 03, 2002 at 02:41:38PM +0100, Peter Haworth wrote:
On Wed, 3 Jul 2002 11:40:44 +0100, Jean-Michel Hiver wrote:
perl: Any iussues with perl/modperl? Besides modperl I will be running a
perl application with a few hundred thousend lines of code...
Wow. For reference last time
On Thu, Jul 04, 2002 at 07:06:30AM -0700, Nick Tonkin wrote:
I'm confused. Since when did bloat surpass elegance as a measure of
success in Perl programming?
:-)
I think it was more of a joke ... or at least primitive Perl
programmer willy-waving ..
Rich.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | Is your
I'm confused. Since when did bloat surpass elegance as a measure of
success in Perl programming?
- nick
Nick Tonkin {|8^)
On Thu, 4 Jul 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Jul 03, 2002 at 02:41:38PM +0100, Peter Haworth wrote:
On Wed, 3 Jul 2002 11:40:44
Nick Tonkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'm confused. Since when did bloat surpass elegance as a measure of
success in Perl programming?
Indeed. Generic question: How many lines of code have you spent today?
--
Frank Cringle, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
voice: (+49 7745) 928759; fax: 928761
perl: Any iussues with perl/modperl? Besides modperl I will be running a
perl application with a few hundred thousend lines of code...
Wow. For reference last time I looked at slashcode it was about 25.000
lines I think. I wonder what kind of application would require more than
that amount of
On Wed, 3 Jul 2002 11:40:44 +0100, Jean-Michel Hiver wrote:
perl: Any iussues with perl/modperl? Besides modperl I will be running a
perl application with a few hundred thousend lines of code...
Wow. For reference last time I looked at slashcode it was about 25.000
lines I think. I wonder
Since everyone's become distracted by the lines of code number, I
answered a few of the questions that I feel I can answer.
Apache/modperl installation and updates: I assume installation is
straight forward, how about keeping current? As those are remotely
administered platforms, chances
-- Barry Hoggard [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 07/03/02 11:52:21 -0400
You're talking about using their packages? I suspect most people on this
list build their own apache/mod_perl binaries.
Nearly always a good idea since it's (a) remarkably
simple to do and (b) ensures that the current perl's
I'm using RedHat on my servers; can't do comparison to SuSe since I
don't know it, but I'll comment on the RedHat side. I got into RedHat
because of the RPM utility, around 4.2 I think, and have stayed with
it because nothing has yet annoyed me enough to switch.
Gerd Knops [EMAIL PROTECTED]
lol... We're running a little over 175000 lines of (mod)perl code,
currently running on a mix of RedHat 7.1, 7.2, 7.3 and Advanced Server.
Next?
On Wed, 2002-07-03 at 09:41, Peter Haworth wrote:
On Wed, 3 Jul 2002 11:40:44 +0100, Jean-Michel Hiver wrote:
perl: Any iussues with perl/modperl?
Software-based RAID 1: Is it usable (only for a data partition, not
required for the root partition)? Is it easy to recover from a broken
disk?
If possible, consider using hardware RAID, like Mylex ones; they are
quite expensive, because of SCSI disks, but you gain cpu cycles;
I've used
-Michel Hiver [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Gerd Knops [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 03, 2002 11:53 AM
Subject: Re: [OT] Better Linux server platform: Redhat or SuSe?
lol... We're running a little over 175000 lines of (mod)perl code,
currently running on a mix of RedHat 7.1, 7.2
Valerio_Valdez Paolini [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Software-based RAID 1: Is it usable (only for a data partition, not
required for the root partition)? Is it easy to recover from a broken
disk?
If possible, consider using hardware RAID, like Mylex ones; they are
quite expensive, because
David Dyer-Bennet writes:
Obviously hardware RAID will save CPU cycles somewhat, and SCSI disks
of the right type will increase IO bandwidth somewhat, but if you're
not short of those things and still want the added security of
mirroring, I think the software RAID is a viable option.
Harware
On Wed, 3 Jul 2002, Rob Nagler wrote:
David Dyer-Bennet writes:
Obviously hardware RAID will save CPU cycles somewhat, and SCSI disks
of the right type will increase IO bandwidth somewhat, but if you're
not short of those things and still want the added security of
mirroring, I think
From: Barry Hoggard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 03 Jul 2002 11:52:21 -0400
Remote maintability: Is it possible to remotely upgrade between OS
versions for either of those platforms (not a must, but would be a plus)?
I would be afraid to do that remotely, since it normally
];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 03, 2002 11:53 AM
Subject: Re: [OT] Better Linux server platform: Redhat or SuSe?
lol... We're running a little over 175000 lines of (mod)perl code,
currently running on a mix of RedHat 7.1, 7.2, 7.3 and Advanced Server.
Next?
On Wed, 2002-07-03
Hi,
Sorry for this somewhat OT post (though it may be of general interest).
I am currently maintaining a WAN (4 continents) consisting of FreeBSD
machines. While I am quite happy with FreeBSD, lack of driver support for
some boards I need to use forces me to switch to Linux. And while the
26 matches
Mail list logo
