On Thu, 31 Aug 2000, martin langhoff wrote:
...
As you may have imagined, it maybe trivial to do in Apache (I haven't
done it yet, but I hope it is).
I usually do it with mod_rewrite. Something like
RewriteEngine on
RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST}!^www\.ek\.dk$
the mod_perl related background:
I was recently asked if one of the domains we were hosting could have
its users folders mapped in the domain name. Something like
folder.domain.com, instead of domain.com/folder . My silly mind tumbled
around, mumbling at which apache request I was going
On Thu, 31 Aug 2000, martin langhoff wrote:
the mod_perl related background:
I was recently asked if one of the domains we were hosting could have
its users folders mapped in the domain name. Something like
folder.domain.com, instead of domain.com/folder . My silly mind tumbled
martin langhoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Is it possible to tell BIND to catch *.domain.com and answer the same
ip?
Plan A: Generate the zone files from the database.
Plan B: Use the beta of Bind 9 which, I believe, has database bindings
promised.
I've hacked around with something
On Aug 31, David Hodgkinson wrote:
martin langhoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Is it possible to tell BIND to catch *.domain.com and answer the same
ip?
Plan A: Generate the zone files from the database.
Plan B: Use the beta of Bind 9 which, I believe, has database bindings
Jim Winstead [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Aug 31, David Hodgkinson wrote:
martin langhoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Is it possible to tell BIND to catch *.domain.com and answer the same
ip?
Plan A: Generate the zone files from the database.
Plan B: Use the beta of Bind
Jim Winstead wrote:
plan c: use a wildcard record and move on to real problems. :)
Bummer! I had thought I actually had a real problem ...
gotta move on to find one !
martin [who can't believe this list's so great]
Matt Sergeant wrote:
Yes, I believe the entry is simply *.domain.com!
Then use mod_rewrite to map the right folder.
Yup. Beware though, there are certain issues you may need to think of if
you're going to be sending/receiving mail from these domain names. One
problem is the reverse name
