]Date 22:43:28 1 August
2000
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:(bcc: Simon Wilcox/BASE/WilliamsLea)
Fax to:
Subject: Re: [OT] The $64K question/server hardware
On Tue, Aug 01, 2000 at 02:32:52PM -0700, ___cliff rayman___ wrote:
[ .. snip .. ]
Since this has potential
I've been using a dual processor, PIII 400+ Mhz Dell PowerEdge server
that has 512MB RAM 2 9GB SCSI drives running Redhat Linux, Apache,
mod_perl, HTML::Embperl and it's been working like a champ.
Price tag: $8000
Not to plug Dell but they have some really nice server offerings and now
fully
22:43:28 1 August
2000
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:(bcc: Simon Wilcox/BASE/WilliamsLea)
Fax to:
Subject: Re: [OT] The $64K question/server hardware
On Tue, Aug 01, 2000 at 02:32:52PM -0700, ___cliff rayman___ wrote:
[ .. snip .. ]
Since this has potential
I can vouch for that. We had a site running some distance ed software.
The *nix version ran like a champ and would stay up and running for
months.
The NT version? Would require pre-emptive reboots to try and prevent
unscheduled system downtimes. Also, the server would just crap out
without
On Tue, 1 Aug 2000, Bill Moseley wrote:
Hi,
I'm not sure why, but someone asked me to review a bid they received for a
server to run their site. That's where the $64,000 USD part comes from.
Whew!
This is not a commerce site (it's a .org), and unlikely to get slashdotted.
24/7 is
i am running a PII 350 w/128mg ram and SCSI-2 7200rpm harddrives.
i put out as many at 12K page views a day, nothing compared to Ask at Valueclick,
although my pages are kind of big - about 60K worth.
all of my pages have dynamic content rendered with mod_perl and Embperl and I
suppress browser
On Tue, Aug 01, 2000 at 02:32:52PM -0700, ___cliff rayman___ wrote:
[ .. snip .. ]
Since this has potential for becoming another long thread with people
posting their stories and some other people flaming for not doing things
in a certain way, I have suggestions for this monster thread in the
