Hi, all.
Nothing really new here -- just thought I'd note that perl.com has "a
budget to burn" and an open invitation for anything perl related.
Please see below; I repost the perl.com mailing in it's entirety
(please forgive the size, but I hate plagiarism. =o)
===
On Fri, 16 Feb 2001, Paul wrote:
> Hi, all.
> Nothing really new here -- just thought I'd note that perl.com has "a
> budget to burn" and an open invitation for anything perl related.
> Please see below; I repost the perl.com mailing in it's entirety
> (please forgive the size, but I hate plagiar
On Fri, Feb 16, 2001 at 03:14:37PM +, Matt Sergeant wrote:
> I wonder if I should write them an article about take23, and then
> use the funds to pay for articles for take23 :-)
Geez, Matt, you promote take23 every chance you get.
That's worse than me mentioning Avacet (www.avacet.com
At 10:25 AM 2/16/01 -0500, DeWitt Clinton wrote:
>On Fri, Feb 16, 2001 at 03:14:37PM +, Matt Sergeant wrote:
>
> > I wonder if I should write them an article about take23, and then
> > use the funds to pay for articles for take23 :-)
>
>Geez, Matt, you promote take23 every chance you get.
> "Gunther" == Gunther Birznieks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Gunther> Too tired to think of clever plugs for myself or I would be doing so.
you know I'd never (see my .sig) plug anything (see my .sig) like
that in the body (see my .sig) of a message. That'd be
(see my .sig) crass commercial
On Fri, 16 Feb 2001, Gunther Birznieks wrote:
> At 10:25 AM 2/16/01 -0500, DeWitt Clinton wrote:
> >On Fri, Feb 16, 2001 at 03:14:37PM +, Matt Sergeant wrote:
> >
> > > I wonder if I should write them an article about take23, and then
> > > use the funds to pay for articles for take23 :-)
