Hi, all.
Nothing really new here -- just thought I'd note that perl.com has "a
budget to burn" and an open invitation for anything perl related.
Please see below; I repost the perl.com mailing in it's entirety
(please forgive the size, but I hate plagiarism. =o)
On Fri, Feb 16, 2001 at 03:14:37PM +, Matt Sergeant wrote:
I wonder if I should write them an article about take23, and then
use the funds to pay for articles for take23 :-)
Geez, Matt, you promote take23 every chance you get.
That's worse than me mentioning Avacet
At 10:25 AM 2/16/01 -0500, DeWitt Clinton wrote:
On Fri, Feb 16, 2001 at 03:14:37PM +, Matt Sergeant wrote:
I wonder if I should write them an article about take23, and then
use the funds to pay for articles for take23 :-)
Geez, Matt, you promote take23 every chance you get.
To be
"Gunther" == Gunther Birznieks [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Gunther Too tired to think of clever plugs for myself or I would be doing so.
you know I'd never (see my .sig) plug anything (see my .sig) like
that in the body (see my .sig) of a message. That'd be
(see my .sig) crass commercialism.
On Fri, 16 Feb 2001, Gunther Birznieks wrote:
At 10:25 AM 2/16/01 -0500, DeWitt Clinton wrote:
On Fri, Feb 16, 2001 at 03:14:37PM +, Matt Sergeant wrote:
I wonder if I should write them an article about take23, and then
use the funds to pay for articles for take23 :-)
Geez,
