On 20 Apr 2000, Randal L. Schwartz wrote:
> > "Doug" == Doug MacEachern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Doug> why all the globals?? symbol table lookups are much slower than
> Doug> lexicals.
>
> If I recall, the word lately is that they're much closer than they were.
i take it back, the
> "Doug" == Doug MacEachern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Doug> why all the globals?? symbol table lookups are much slower than
Doug> lexicals.
If I recall, the word lately is that they're much closer than they were.
But lexicals are still "cleaner", if I recall.
--
Randal L. Schwartz - St
> So this (attached) section is to be deleted now as a non-relevant?
i suppose.
On Mon, 17 Apr 2000, Vivek Khera wrote:
> > "SB" == Stas Bekman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> SB> Of course, anyone has a sample section handy? I'm still an
> SB> C fan, to be changed soon :)
>
> I don't see what sections have to do with using or not
> Apache::Registry instead of handle
On Thu, 20 Apr 2000, Doug MacEachern wrote:
> On Fri, 14 Apr 2000, Stas Bekman wrote:
>
> > use vars qw($q $switch $status $sessionID);
>
> why all the globals?? symbol table lookups are much slower than lexicals.
> please don't promote globals, pass lexicals to the subroutines.
Yeah, I'll
On Fri, 14 Apr 2000, Stas Bekman wrote:
> use vars qw($q $switch $status $sessionID);
why all the globals?? symbol table lookups are much slower than lexicals.
please don't promote globals, pass lexicals to the subroutines.
> sub handler{
> my $r = shift;
> Apache->request($r);
On Mon, 17 Apr 2000, Vivek Khera wrote:
> > "MS" == Matt Sergeant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> >> adding handlers as easy as adding Registry scripts. I guess it is
> >> sort of an ultra-light-weight Registry, in some sense.
>
> MS> I've got something pretty similar. Let me know if you w
> "MS" == Matt Sergeant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> adding handlers as easy as adding Registry scripts. I guess it is
>> sort of an ultra-light-weight Registry, in some sense.
MS> I've got something pretty similar. Let me know if you want some code.
Sure; it is always good to see other
> "DT" == Drew Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
DT> are beginning the transition to Apache handlers. One other thing that I
DT> would love is a module to do checkboxes/pull-down list generation ALA
DT> CGI.pm. I might rip off some code and create a module myself. I think it
Have a look at
Matt Sergeant wrote:
>
> On Mon, 17 Apr 2000, Vivek Khera wrote:
>
> > But, I've been toying with the idea of writing an Apache::Dispatch
> > module that would take all URL's of the form something like
> >
> > http://localhost/perl/My/Module/handlerfunc
> >
> > and dispatch the call to My::Modul
On Mon, 17 Apr 2000, Vivek Khera wrote:
> But, I've been toying with the idea of writing an Apache::Dispatch
> module that would take all URL's of the form something like
>
> http://localhost/perl/My/Module/handlerfunc
>
> and dispatch the call to My::Module::handlerfunc()
>
> Assuming that My
On Mon, 17 Apr 2000, Vivek Khera wrote:
> > "SB" == Stas Bekman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> SB> Of course, anyone has a sample section handy? I'm still an
> SB> C fan, to be changed soon :)
>
> I don't see what sections have to do with using or not
> Apache::Registry instead of handle
> "SB" == Stas Bekman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
SB> Of course, anyone has a sample section handy? I'm still an
SB> C fan, to be changed soon :)
I don't see what sections have to do with using or not
Apache::Registry instead of handlers...
But, I've been toying with the idea of writing a
On Fri, 14 Apr 2000, Chris Nokleberg wrote:
>
> > Someone has asked how to move from registry scripts to perl handlers, this
> > is my attempt to show in details the process. Comments are welcome.
>
> In my mind, one of the biggest problems in transitioning from
> Apache::Registry is the added
> Someone has asked how to move from registry scripts to perl handlers, this
> is my attempt to show in details the process. Comments are welcome.
In my mind, one of the biggest problems in transitioning from
Apache::Registry is the added server configuration complexity. Would it be
possible to
Someone has asked how to move from registry scripts to perl handlers, this
is my attempt to show in details the process. Comments are welcome.
=head1 Transitioning from Apache::Registry to Apache handlers
Even if you are a CGI script die-hard at some point you might want to
move a few or all you
16 matches
Mail list logo
