Re: [Re: [Re: again - more then one PerlTransHandler]]

1999-12-22 Thread Andrei A. Voropaev
I believe this should be reflected in the documentation. Because after reading Eagle book one gets absolutely different understanding. It doesn't diffirentiate Perl stacked handlers and Apache handlers. From Doug's words (and from practice :) those are slightly different in the way how their

Re: [Re: [Re: again - more then one PerlTransHandler]]

1999-12-21 Thread Doug MacEachern
At least that's what I thought ! In fact now Apache lets me use more then one PerlTransHandler, but it doesn't care of what is the return codes are!!! Even I return OK, it still calls next registered handlers. Really weird! mod_perl does care. but, mod_perl stacked handlers are not

Re: [Re: [Re: again - more then one PerlTransHandler]]

1999-12-19 Thread Evgenii Bazarov
Thanks for the answers! I was using RedHat rpm and it was giving the problem as it was suggested. After I built mod_perl with apache (mod_perl 1.21, apache 1.3.9, the problem was resolved. At least that's what I thought ! In fact now Apache lets me use more then one PerlTransHandler, but it

Re: [Re: again - more then one PerlTransHandler]

1999-12-16 Thread Evgenii Bazarov
Waa!!! So far nobody who answered even doubted that it should be possible to have more then one PerlTransHandler. The "Eagle" book also says that it should be possible. People suggested that either my mod_perl built with wrong flags or I messed up return codes OK/DECLINED (which I didn't!). Is

Re: [Re: again - more then one PerlTransHandler]

1999-12-16 Thread Eric Cholet
On Thu, 16 Dec 1999, you wrote: Waa!!! So far nobody who answered even doubted that it should be possible to have more then one PerlTransHandler. The "Eagle" book also says that it should be possible. People suggested that either my mod_perl built with wrong flags or I messed up return