[admin] no HTML posts please

2000-04-18 Thread Stas Bekman
"When thou enter a city, abide by its customs" -- Talmud Please, please refrain *posting* in *HTML*! If you want to get help, take another second to *think* what are you doing *before* you send the email... Say 'Yes' to the plain text, 'No' to HTML! Thank you! P.S. I don't know

[admin] NO HTML posts please!

2000-03-30 Thread Stas Bekman
Folks, please refrain from posting in HTML. Some of us use email clients that post and read email in the old good text mode. When I don't have enough time on my hands I delete such emails since I cannot read them right away. Probably others too. Please don't tell me to get more

Re: [admin] NO HTML posts please!

2000-03-30 Thread Matt Sergeant
On Thu, 30 Mar 2000, Stas Bekman wrote: Please don't tell me to get more _sophisticated_ email client, my pine does everything for me. HTML should NOT be used for posting emails. Not only that, the list of mail sizes on mod_perl went: 1k 3k 2k 4k 20k - HTML Yikes. (although pine 4 and

Re: [admin] NO HTML posts please!

2000-03-30 Thread Sam Carleton
Stas Bekman wrote: Folks, please refrain from posting in HTML. Some of us use email clients that post and read email in the old good text mode. When I don't have enough time on my hands I delete such emails since I cannot read them right away. Probably others too. Please don't tell me to

Re: [admin] NO HTML posts please!

2000-03-30 Thread Chip Turner
Stas Bekman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I agree 100%. HTML belongs in web browsers. If you happen to have a web browser in your mail reader, fine, but don't force others to have one as well :) Chip Folks, please refrain from posting in HTML. Some of us use email clients that post and read

Re: [admin] NO HTML posts please!

2000-03-30 Thread J. Horner
On Thu, 30 Mar 2000, Sam Carleton wrote: Stas Bekman wrote: Folks, please refrain from posting in HTML. Some of us use email clients that post and read email in the old good text mode. When I don't have enough time on my hands I delete such emails since I cannot read them right

Re: [admin] NO HTML posts please!

2000-03-30 Thread Angel R. Rivera
how about avoiding the me toos... At 02:04 PM 3/30/00 -0500, J. Horner wrote: On Thu, 30 Mar 2000, Sam Carleton wrote: Stas Bekman wrote: Folks, please refrain from posting in HTML. Some of us use email clients that post and read email in the old good text mode. When I don't

Re: [admin] NO HTML posts please!

2000-03-30 Thread Randal L. Schwartz
"Angel" == Angel R Rivera [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Angel how about avoiding the me toos... Yeah, and the people that post "upside down", with the answer *before* the question! Definitely. Let's avoid those. -- Randal L. Schwartz - Stonehenge Consulting Services, Inc. - +1 503 777 0095

Re: [admin] NO HTML posts please!

2000-03-30 Thread Tom Christiansen
how about avoiding the me toos... [44 lines of crud we've already seen before] Hm... something wrong's with that message... % msgchk `mhpath cur` Quote follows response, Jeopardy style #2 Overquoted: 30 lines quoted out of 41: 73% Non-canonical signature separator:

Re: [admin] NO HTML posts please!

2000-03-30 Thread David Block
ROTFLOL On 30 Mar 2000, Randal L. Schwartz wrote: "Angel" == Angel R Rivera [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Angel how about avoiding the me toos... Yeah, and the people that post "upside down", with the answer *before* the question! Definitely. Let's avoid those. -- Randal L.

Re: [admin] NO HTML posts please!

2000-03-30 Thread Doug MacEachern
esrever ni snoitseuq gnirewsna diova esaelp dna On 30 Mar 2000, Randal L. Schwartz wrote: "Angel" == Angel R Rivera [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Angel how about avoiding the me toos... Yeah, and the people that post "upside down", with the answer *before* the question!