Re: Apache::ASP rules [was: Sorry men]

2000-04-28 Thread Francesc Guasch
Ime Smits wrote: Bottomline: Apache::ASP made me really happy because now don't have to develop for IIS anymore and I can stick to my Linux environment. I can I'm also being told every once in a while by management about why we aren't using IIS, you know, when they receive marketing

Re: Apache::ASP rules [was: Sorry men]

2000-04-28 Thread Joshua Chamas
Ime Smits wrote: | Oh, almost forget it... ASP is a loose of time on developer time... and the | module is to heavy, sorry but betwen oracle and ASP our server is down in | performance, we run unix on a SGI and with 256mb ram... | If you are trying to put ASP cause you don´t want to break

Re: Apache::ASP rules [was: Sorry men]

2000-04-28 Thread Matt Sergeant
On Fri, 28 Apr 2000, Francesc Guasch wrote: Ime Smits wrote: Bottomline: Apache::ASP made me really happy because now don't have to develop for IIS anymore and I can stick to my Linux environment. I can I'm also being told every once in a while by management about why we aren't using

Re: Apache::ASP rules [was: Sorry men]

2000-04-28 Thread Tom Peer
Horror stories? On a live site when a static page is being accessed NT can lock the page and not unlock it even when you've stopped the internet service - handy when you've got someone shouting at you to change a mistake. If you change the default (eg index.htm) page in a directory to a dynamic

Apache::ASP rules [was: Sorry men]

2000-04-27 Thread Ime Smits
| Oh, almost forget it... ASP is a loose of time on developer time... and the | module is to heavy, sorry but betwen oracle and ASP our server is down in | performance, we run unix on a SGI and with 256mb ram... | If you are trying to put ASP cause you don´t want to break the designer | work, you