Re: Apache::Reload 0.04

2000-09-02 Thread Joshua Chamas
Greg Stark wrote: > > Stas Bekman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > But adds an additional stat() call for each request, which might be not > > desired for "some" sites... I know it's quite fast. See: > > >http://thingy.kcilink.com/modperlguide/performance/Reducing_the_Number_of_stat_Ca.html >

Re: Apache::Reload 0.04

2000-09-02 Thread Stas Bekman
> Stas Bekman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > But adds an additional stat() call for each request, which might be not > > desired for "some" sites... I know it's quite fast. See: > > >http://thingy.kcilink.com/modperlguide/performance/Reducing_the_Number_of_stat_Ca.html > > > > But, yeah it's

Re: Apache::Reload 0.04

2000-09-01 Thread Greg Stark
Stas Bekman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > But adds an additional stat() call for each request, which might be not > desired for "some" sites... I know it's quite fast. See: > >http://thingy.kcilink.com/modperlguide/performance/Reducing_the_Number_of_stat_Ca.html > > But, yeah it's cool! In pr

RE: [ANNOUNCE] Apache::Reload 0.04

2000-08-30 Thread Stas Bekman
On Wed, 30 Aug 2000, Matt Sergeant wrote: > On Wed, 30 Aug 2000, Stas Bekman wrote: > > > On Wed, 30 Aug 2000, Matt Sergeant wrote: > > > > > On Wed, 30 Aug 2000, Douglas Wilson wrote: > > > > > > > Forgive me if this is a stupid question, but I am rather > > > > ignorant in regards to mod_per

RE: [ANNOUNCE] Apache::Reload 0.04

2000-08-30 Thread Matt Sergeant
On Wed, 30 Aug 2000, Stas Bekman wrote: > On Wed, 30 Aug 2000, Matt Sergeant wrote: > > > On Wed, 30 Aug 2000, Douglas Wilson wrote: > > > > > Forgive me if this is a stupid question, but I am rather > > > ignorant in regards to mod_perl, and I'm curious about > > > something. > > > > > > If y

RE: [ANNOUNCE] Apache::Reload 0.04

2000-08-30 Thread Stas Bekman
On Wed, 30 Aug 2000, Matt Sergeant wrote: > On Wed, 30 Aug 2000, Douglas Wilson wrote: > > > Forgive me if this is a stupid question, but I am rather > > ignorant in regards to mod_perl, and I'm curious about > > something. > > > > If you reload modules, does that increase the size of the > > f

RE: [ANNOUNCE] Apache::Reload 0.04

2000-08-30 Thread Matt Sergeant
On Wed, 30 Aug 2000, Douglas Wilson wrote: > Forgive me if this is a stupid question, but I am rather > ignorant in regards to mod_perl, and I'm curious about > something. > > If you reload modules, does that increase the size of the > forked children of the parent process? Or does just the > pa

RE: [ANNOUNCE] Apache::Reload 0.04

2000-08-30 Thread Douglas Wilson
Forgive me if this is a stupid question, but I am rather ignorant in regards to mod_perl, and I'm curious about something. If you reload modules, does that increase the size of the forked children of the parent process? Or does just the parent reload, with the children having to die and respawn?

[ANNOUNCE] Apache::Reload 0.04

2000-08-30 Thread Matt Sergeant
This release adds the ability to specify modules to reload in the config file as well as in the module itself. Docs below: NAME Apache::Reload - Reload changed modules SYNOPSIS In httpd.conf: PerlInitHandler Apache::Reload PerlSetVar ReloadAll Off Then your module: