Re: Apache : mod_perl vs fastcgi

2000-07-07 Thread David Hodgkinson
Dana Powers [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: FastCGI with perl may or may not be that fast. I could be totally wrong here but I believe that FastCGI will be able to cache the perl runtime, but perl will still have to reload and recompile any scripts during every hit. Not true. You put some code

Re: Apache : mod_perl vs fastcgi

2000-07-07 Thread Gunther Birznieks
In addition, you can read the CGI.pm documentation on the use of Perl/CGI.pm with FastCGI and you'll be good to go with that get next request technique. At 08:14 AM 7/7/00 +0100, David Hodgkinson wrote: Dana Powers [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: FastCGI with perl may or may not be that fast. I

Apache : mod_perl vs fastcgi

2000-07-06 Thread Yury XTC
Hi! Instaled : FreeBSD 4.0 + Apache 1.3.12 + mod_perl 1.24 + FastCGI 0.52 1) I installed apache with mod_perl - the speed increased.But I didn't understand HOW mod_perl optimizes use of resources and increases speed ? Does it share perl interpreter, script or anything else? 2) Then I installed

Re: Apache : mod_perl vs fastcgi

2000-07-06 Thread Pramod Sokke
1) I installed apache with mod_perl - the speed increased.But I didn't understand HOW mod_perl optimizes use of resources and increases speed ? Does it share perl interpreter, script or anything else? The Perl runtime library is linked into the server. The persistent interpreter embedded in the

Re: Apache : mod_perl vs fastcgi

2000-07-06 Thread Dana Powers
On Thu, 06 Jul 2000, Pramod Sokke wrote: 1) I installed apache with mod_perl - the speed increased.But I didn't understand HOW mod_perl optimizes use of resources and increases speed ? Does it share perl interpreter, script or anything else? The Perl runtime library is linked into the