"JT" == Jimi Thompson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
JT working??? Why is it that no one has ever posted an actual working copy
JT of an httpd.conf file for mod_perl in its various incarnations? Could it
JT be because one doesn't exist?
You haven't looked hard enough. I've posted complete
On Mon, 30 Oct 2000, Jimi Thompson wrote:
It is me or has anyone noticed a definite LACK of information on how to
modify the httpd.conf for the various modules in order to get them
working??? Why is it that no one has ever posted an actual working copy
of an httpd.conf file for mod_perl in
hompson" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 30, 2000 7:00 PM
Subject: Apache Modules in General
It is me or has anyone noticed a definite LACK of information on how to
modify the httpd.conf for the various modules in order to get them
working??? Why is it that no
You need an Apache book (www.oreilly.com), the Guide
(perl.apache.org/guide), and a Valium, not necessarily in that order ;-)
Jimi Thompson wrote:
I think it's all a hoax
Title: RE: Apache Modules in General
What's your problem ?!
http://perl.apache.org
Check the site before you say anything.
Kevin Huang\\
-Original Message-
From: Jimi Thompson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, October 30, 2000 4:01 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject
directly concerned
with mod_perl - it rambles around at times but that's the main thrust.
So Apache modules in general is kindofa broad remit, but you'll get
some help here if you keep your nerve. :)
Why is it that no one has ever posted an actual working copy
of an httpd.conf file for mod_perl
