Hi,
I haven't installed Apache 2.0 yet but I like the sound of 250
worker threads set as the default!
I would love to run 250 Apache children on my linux server but I
just don't have enough memory (50 children max).
250 http server threads running concurrently would be
Hi there,
On Wed, 24 Apr 2002, Nigel Hamilton wrote:
250 http server threads running concurrently would be an order of
magnitude more powerful than my current set up.
Have I got this right? or am I missing a big catch?
No and yes in that order. Your computer won't be any more
250 http server threads running concurrently would be an order of
magnitude more powerful than my current set up.
Have I got this right? or am I missing a big catch?
No and yes in that order. Your computer won't be any more powerful,
no matter how many threads you run...
Nigel Hamilton wrote:
I would love to run 250 Apache children on my linux server but I
just don't have enough memory (50 children max).
thread still needs its own perl interpreter.Then you probably won't
have enough memory with Apache 2 either. There is some additional
memory
