Re: Augmenting CPAN with P2EE specs, was CPAN polution

2001-08-13 Thread kyle dawkins
Hi All I was reading all the posts about people whining about the state of CPAN (as people should... it's hard to tell what's going on in CPAN these days ;-) and the topic has drifted to this "P2EE" thing that's getting thrown around. I somehow feel vindicated: http://www.geocrawler.com/arch

Re: Augmenting CPAN with P2EE specs, was CPAN polution

2001-08-13 Thread Gunther Birznieks
At 12:10 PM 8/11/2001 -0400, Stephen Adkins wrote: >Hi, > >At 04:42 PM 8/11/2001 +0200, Elizabeth Mattijsen wrote: > >At 09:26 AM 8/11/01 -0500, Jim Smith wrote: > >>If we want better QA, I'd propose requiring approval from someone on that > >>list before a module is put anywhere in the heirarchy