On Thu, Nov 08, 2001 at 08:59:55AM -0800, Bill Moseley wrote:
Hi,
verbose
I'm looking for a little discussion on selecting a data storage method, and
I'm posting here because Cache::Cache often is discussed here (along with
Apache::Session). And people here are smart, of course ;).
On Thu, 2001-11-08 at 10:11, Barrie Slaymaker wrote:
On Thu, Nov 08, 2001 at 08:59:55AM -0800, Bill Moseley wrote:
Hi,
verbose
I'm looking for a little discussion on selecting a data storage method, and
I'm posting here because Cache::Cache often is discussed here (along with
On Thu, Nov 08, 2001 at 01:11:21PM -0500, Barrie Slaymaker wrote:
Even a bit more OT: one thing to watch out for, especially if you
plan on caching a *lot* of data, is that the Cache::* modules did
not do collision detection on MD5 collisions the last time I looked.
Forgive me if that's
Hello,
DCFor example, file system caches fill their directories roughly equally
DCwhen their paths are created from MD5 hashed keys. Doing something
DCsimple and unique like URL-encoding the key to make a legal identifier
DC(legal in the sense that it is a valid filename) wouldn't distribute as
At 10:54 AM 11/08/01 -0800, Andrew Ho wrote:
For example, say your keys are e-mail addresses and you just want to use
an MD5 hash to spread your data files over directories so that no one
directory has too many files in it. Say your original key is
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (hex encoded MD5 hash of this
On Thu, Nov 08, 2001 at 10:54:11AM -0800, Andrew Ho wrote:
Let me point out that if you are using MD5 hashes for directory spreading
(i.e. to spread a large number of files across a tree of directories so
that no one directory is filled with too many files for efficient
filesystem access),
