Kelly White wrote:
>
> I am considering using either HTML::Mason or Apache::Registry for my CGI
> scripts, but am not sure which is faster. Would the template/pages be cached
> like the scripts are in Registry? Which would be faster? Obviously using
> Mason would make cleaner code, but it woul
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Kelly White) wrote:
>I am considering using either HTML::Mason or Apache::Registry for my CGI
>scripts, but am not sure which is faster. Would the template/pages be cached
>like the scripts are in Registry? Which would be faster? Obviously using
>Mason would make cleaner code
I am considering using either HTML::Mason or Apache::Registry for my CGI
scripts, but am not sure which is faster. Would the template/pages be cached
like the scripts are in Registry? Which would be faster? Obviously using
Mason would make cleaner code, but it wouldn't get compiled, would it?
