Kelly White wrote:
I am considering using either HTML::Mason or Apache::Registry for my CGI
scripts, but am not sure which is faster. Would the template/pages be cached
like the scripts are in Registry? Which would be faster? Obviously using
Mason would make cleaner code, but it wouldn't
I am considering using either HTML::Mason or Apache::Registry for my CGI
scripts, but am not sure which is faster. Would the template/pages be cached
like the scripts are in Registry? Which would be faster? Obviously using
Mason would make cleaner code, but it wouldn't get compiled, would it?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Kelly White) wrote:
I am considering using either HTML::Mason or Apache::Registry for my CGI
scripts, but am not sure which is faster. Would the template/pages be cached
like the scripts are in Registry? Which would be faster? Obviously using
Mason would make cleaner code,
