On Tue, 9 May 2000, Keith G. Murphy wrote:
> Date: Tue, 09 May 2000 09:43:29 -0500
> From: Keith G. Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: mod_perl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: OT: Re: Most nonesense I've ever read about mod_perl
>
> Frank Mayhar wrote:
>
Frank Mayhar wrote:
>
> Matt Sergeant wrote:
> > On Sun, 7 May 2000, Frank Mayhar wrote:
> > > Perl does have some good constructs for Web work, too. I've been writing
> > > a webstore and some stuff is really convenient that would be inconvenient
> > > in C. On the other hand, there's some stu
Matt Sergeant wrote:
> On Sun, 7 May 2000, Frank Mayhar wrote:
> > Perl does have some good constructs for Web work, too. I've been writing
> > a webstore and some stuff is really convenient that would be inconvenient
> > in C. On the other hand, there's some stuff that I just wouldn't use Perl
On Sun, 7 May 2000, Frank Mayhar wrote:
> Perl does have some good constructs for Web work, too. I've been writing
> a webstore and some stuff is really convenient that would be inconvenient
> in C. On the other hand, there's some stuff that I just wouldn't use Perl
> for, like, say, a system d
Michael hall wrote:
> You make me sound ancient :-) When I started at the UofM (1971) it was
> Fortran 77 [...]
^^
Eh? :-)
Fortran IV, maybe.
> theory, algorithms, style, etc., just dry examples out of text books.
> Lot of good any of that
On Sun, May 07, 2000 at 08:20:34PM -0400, Jeff Stuart wrote:
> [...rest of message deleted...]
> > Every language has it use, the truly knowledgeable understand when to
> > use each language:)
>
> > Sam
> Amen to that!!! I think that this point and the point about writing GOOD
> algorithms are
