On Fri, 26 May 2000, Fred Miller wrote:
Thank you very much. Sorry for being such a newbie.
no need to apologize, this sort of problem isn't normal, if anyone should
say sorry, it's sun for their flawed compiler kit.
I rebuilt Perl with gcc, and then was able to get a build of Apache with
Doug MacEachern wrote:
On Wed, 24 May 2000, Fred Miller wrote:
Like I said, I'm a bit naive in these matters. I didn't specify using
gcc or cc. I used the same path to compile Perl, Apache, and Mod_Perl.
When I aaksed which gcc and which cc, my machine does report gcc
appearing in my
On Wed, 24 May 2000, Fred Miller wrote:
Like I said, I'm a bit naive in these matters. I didn't specify using
gcc or cc. I used the same path to compile Perl, Apache, and Mod_Perl.
When I aaksed which gcc and which cc, my machine does report gcc
appearing in my path ahead of cc. Could that
Fred Miller wrote:
Doug MacEachern wrote:
looking at the line number, i would try replacing any occurance of:
perl_eval_sv - eval_sv
perl_call_sv - call_sv
perl_call_pv - call_pv
I wish I was experienced enough to know what this means.
Now I think I'm starting to get confused.
On 4/26/2000, Steve Hay wrote about "Problem compiling mod_perl 1.23 on
Solaris 2.4"
I am experiencing what appears to be a very similar problem, but with
more recent modules and OS. I am running mod_perl 1.24, Perl 5.6.0,
Apache 1.3.12, Solaris 2.6
Perl Makefile.PL with options runs
On Tue, 23 May 2000, Fred Miller wrote:
On 4/26/2000, Steve Hay wrote about "Problem compiling mod_perl 1.23 on
Solaris 2.4"
I am experiencing what appears to be a very similar problem, but with
more recent modules and OS. I am running mod_perl 1.24, Perl 5.6.0,
Apache 1.3.12, Solaris 2.6
