Re: Q & A: $r->custom_response

2002-04-23 Thread Per Einar Ellefsen
At 22:04 23.04.2002, Perrin Harkins wrote: >Per Einar Ellefsen wrote: >>I suppose Apache::Constants could have been extended to return globals if >>requested... But is there really any gain in that? > >Only in that people will not get tripped up by the possible bugs that >using subroutines as co

Re: Q & A: $r->custom_response

2002-04-23 Thread Perrin Harkins
Per Einar Ellefsen wrote: > I suppose Apache::Constants could have been extended to return globals > if requested... But is there really any gain in that? Only in that people will not get tripped up by the possible bugs that using subroutines as constants causes. I guess Apache::Constants is

Re: Q & A: $r->custom_response

2002-04-23 Thread Per Einar Ellefsen
At 19:51 23.04.2002, Perrin Harkins wrote: >Per Einar Ellefsen wrote: >>Well, this one is exported by Apache::Constants, so if you don't want to do >>$FORBIDDEN = FORBIDDEN; >>somewhere at the top of your code, you're bound to continue using >>constants, right? > >That's still safer. I used the

Re: Q & A: $r->custom_response

2002-04-23 Thread Geoffrey Young
> Can anyone tell us if the Apache::Constants all just standard HTTP > response codes, or are some of them actually Apache-specific? > there are over 90 constants in Apache::Constants, which range from HTTP constants (like FORBIDDEN for 403) to Apache specific ones (like DECLINED for -1 and

Re: Q & A: $r->custom_response

2002-04-23 Thread Perrin Harkins
Per Einar Ellefsen wrote: > Well, this one is exported by Apache::Constants, so if you don't want to do > $FORBIDDEN = FORBIDDEN; > somewhere at the top of your code, you're bound to continue using > constants, right? That's still safer. I used the constants pragma on a big project and I saw p

Re: Q & A: $r->custom_response

2002-04-23 Thread Per Einar Ellefsen
At 19:38 23.04.2002, Perrin Harkins wrote: >Issac Goldstand wrote: >>Reposting a question (and the answer) that geoff and I discussed in the >>IRC room, as I think it's worthwhile to mention... >>I had the following line of code (actually many of the sort): >>$r->custom_response(FORBIDDEN=>"File

Re: Q & A: $r->custom_response

2002-04-23 Thread Per Einar Ellefsen
At 19:29 23.04.2002, Issac Goldstand wrote: >Reposting a question (and the answer) that geoff and I discussed in the >IRC room, as I think it's worthwhile to mention... > >I had the following line of code (actually many of the sort): >$r->custom_response(FORBIDDEN=>"File size exceeds quota."); >

Re: Q & A: $r->custom_response

2002-04-23 Thread Perrin Harkins
Issac Goldstand wrote: > Reposting a question (and the answer) that geoff and I discussed in the > IRC room, as I think it's worthwhile to mention... > > I had the following line of code (actually many of the sort): > $r->custom_response(FORBIDDEN=>"File size exceeds quota."); > > And kept gett

Q & A: $r->custom_response

2002-04-23 Thread Issac Goldstand
Reposting a question (and the answer) that geoff and I discussed in the IRC room, as I think it's worthwhile to mention... I had the following line of code (actually many of the sort): $r->custom_response(FORBIDDEN=>"File size exceeds quota."); And kept getting errors like: [Tue Apr 23 19:46:14