> The problem I have is that IE5 (and perhaps other browsers
> and versions)
> but NOT Netscape 4.x have absolutely no respect for cache-control.
IE5 can be set up to ignore any cache directives and keep a document
for either the duration of the session or forever. (Or reload it every
single time
In our experience the only thing that guarantees no cacheing is returning
302. Also appending a query string (even an empty one) to the redirect URI
seems to make it even more solid.
So in your script you would build up your destination URI, append
'?foo=bar' to the end of it, and return it as a
On Fri, 26 May 2000, Nick Tonkin wrote:
> In our experience the only thing that guarantees no cacheing is returning
> 302. Also appending a query string (even an empty one) to the redirect URI
> seems to make it even more solid.
>
> So in your script you would build up your destination URI, appe
Tom Mornini wrote:
>
> I have written a handler for delivering select images for a particular
> class of URIs based upon a database item that the user sets in advance.
> This allows us to "skin" some HTML allowing the user to select their look
> of choice.
>
> The problem I have is that IE5 (and
