Frank Mayhar wrote:
Matt Sergeant wrote:
On Sun, 7 May 2000, Frank Mayhar wrote:
Perl does have some good constructs for Web work, too. I've been writing
a webstore and some stuff is really convenient that would be inconvenient
in C. On the other hand, there's some stuff that I
On Tue, 9 May 2000, Keith G. Murphy wrote:
Date: Tue, 09 May 2000 09:43:29 -0500
From: Keith G. Murphy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: mod_perl [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: OT: Re: Most nonesense I've ever read about mod_perl
Frank Mayhar wrote:
Matt Sergeant wrote:
On Sun, 7 May 2000
Michael hall wrote:
You make me sound ancient :-) When I started at the UofM (1971) it was
Fortran 77 [...]
^^
Eh? :-)
Fortran IV, maybe.
theory, algorithms, style, etc., just dry examples out of text books.
Lot of good any of that
On Sun, 7 May 2000, Frank Mayhar wrote:
Perl does have some good constructs for Web work, too. I've been writing
a webstore and some stuff is really convenient that would be inconvenient
in C. On the other hand, there's some stuff that I just wouldn't use Perl
for, like, say, a system
On Sun, 7 May 2000, Jeff Stuart wrote:
[...rest of message deleted...]
Every language has it use, the truly knowledgeable understand when to
use each language:)
Sam
Amen to that!!! I think that this point and the point about writing GOOD
algorithms are VERY important ones and I think
At 08:55 AM 5/8/00 +0100, Matt Sergeant wrote:
On Sun, 7 May 2000, Jeff Stuart wrote:
[...rest of message deleted...]
Every language has it use, the truly knowledgeable understand when to
use each language:)
Sam
Amen to that!!! I think that this point and the point about writing
On Mon, May 08, 2000 at 08:55:56AM +0100, Matt Sergeant wrote:
On Sun, 7 May 2000, Jeff Stuart wrote:
[...rest of message deleted...]
Every language has it use, the truly knowledgeable understand when to
use each language:)
Sam
Amen to that!!! I think that this point and the
At 01:44 AM 5/8/00 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, May 08, 2000 at 08:55:56AM +0100, Matt Sergeant wrote:
On Sun, 7 May 2000, Jeff Stuart wrote:
[...rest of message deleted...]
Every language has it use, the truly knowledgeable understand when to
use each language:)
For GUI programming, I think a "beautiful" object design is
exceptionally important. But once you leave the GUI space, you've
left the area where "beautiful" object designs add much benefit. Most
of us programmers are relagated to things that are less beautiful, but
rather functional.
Matt Sergeant wrote:
On Sun, 7 May 2000, Frank Mayhar wrote:
Perl does have some good constructs for Web work, too. I've been writing
a webstore and some stuff is really convenient that would be inconvenient
in C. On the other hand, there's some stuff that I just wouldn't use Perl
for,
On Sun, May 07, 2000 at 08:20:34PM -0400, Jeff Stuart wrote:
[...rest of message deleted...]
Every language has it use, the truly knowledgeable understand when to
use each language:)
Sam
Amen to that!!! I think that this point and the point about writing GOOD
algorithms are VERY
hi,
There be truth to the reply. You can write all the C or ASM you like, but
your algorithm is where it will count. Anyone who knows how to do BIG-O
will know this.
A good perl programmer will code a bad C programmer under the table with
speed and eficiency.
j.
--
Method Digital Logic
"Jason C. Leach" wrote:
hi,
There be truth to the reply. You can write all the C or ASM you like, but
your algorithm is where it will count. Anyone who knows how to do BIG-O
will know this.
A good perl programmer will code a bad C programmer under the table with
speed and eficiency.
13 matches
Mail list logo
