RE: Templating system opinions (CGI::Application in connection with either HTML::Template or Template::Toolkit)

2003-07-24 Thread Jesse Erlbaum
Hey Randal -- Maybe because it competes with OpenInteract, which is far more established. I don't really think OI and CGI-App are in competition at all. OI attempts to be a uber-framework, a la Mason -- or maybe more like ColdFusion or WebObjects.CGI::Application just focuses on web

Re: Templating system opinions (CGI::Application in connection with either HTML::Template or Template::Toolkit)

2003-07-23 Thread Randal L. Schwartz
Dave == Dave Baker [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Dave I'm curious as to why the combination of CGI::Application and Dave HTML::Template hasn't taken off ... CGI::Application seems to allow a Dave software developer to create an entire CGI app that can be stored and Dave distributed as a module on

Re: Templating system opinions (CGI::Application in connection with either HTML::Template or Template::Toolkit)

2003-07-23 Thread Eric
Hi, That was really interesting to look at. OpenInteract is really impressive. I guess there is always a cost to having a big do it all type of system. That is what made me avoid Mason, it just blew my head off for complexity. Now it is true, I am looking for a bit more than what