RE: mod_perl 1.99 on Win2k with Apache2

2002-07-01 Thread Alessandro Forghieri
Greetings. Nigel Peck wrote: Thanks for the help. When did I reply to you privately? This was just to reiterate for everybody to keep the threads on the list. Since many times those who respond to the questions, suffer afterwards because people decide that the person answering the

Re: mod_perl 1.99 on Win2k with Apache2

2002-07-01 Thread Stas Bekman
Alessandro Forghieri wrote: Greetings. Nigel Peck wrote: Thanks for the help. When did I reply to you privately? This was just to reiterate for everybody to keep the threads on the list. Since many times those who respond to the questions, suffer afterwards because people decide that the

Re: mod_perl 1.99 on Win2k with Apache2

2002-07-01 Thread David Dyer-Bennet
Stas Bekman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I'm +1 on using a preset 'Reply-to:' header. httpd-dev seems to use it solely for the reason you describe. I'm all for helping people to reply back to the list. Ask, can we please have this header set? Can we please *not*? -- David Dyer-Bennet, [EMAIL

Re: mod_perl 1.99 on Win2k with Apache2

2002-06-27 Thread Stas Bekman
Nigel Peck wrote: Would someone please tell me where I can find instructions for installing the above? http://perl.apache.org/release/docs/2.0/os/win32/index.html Nigel, remember that you should reply back to the list if you have any further questions. Do *not* reply to me in private!!!