Re: Apache::ASP compiling extensions

2001-01-12 Thread Joshua Chamas
Aaron Johnson wrote: > > I think to help people coming from CGI or EmbPerl that are used to having all params >in the same > place that having $Form be automatic is a must have. You can have it be an option in >the globals if > there is any potential performance hit for doing it I suppose ( cou

Re: Apache::ASP compiling extensions

2001-01-11 Thread Aaron Johnson
Joshua Chamas wrote: > Aaron Johnson wrote: > > > > If what you are saying is that current EmbPerl code would be able to run > > almost unchanged under ASP that would be very interesting, but presently > > my biggest issues with Apache::ASP are: > > > > - Doesn't "help" with any HTML. > > > > I t

Re: Apache::ASP compiling extensions

2001-01-10 Thread Joshua Chamas
Aaron Johnson wrote: > > If what you are saying is that current EmbPerl code would be able to run > almost unchanged under ASP that would be very interesting, but presently > my biggest issues with Apache::ASP are: > > - Doesn't "help" with any HTML. > I think I know what you mean, and I'm not

Re: Apache::ASP compiling extensions

2001-01-10 Thread Aaron Johnson
If what you are saying is that current EmbPerl code would be able to run almost unchanged under ASP that would be very interesting, but presently my biggest issues with Apache::ASP are: - Doesn't "help" with any HTML. - QueryString and Form from the Response are separate, this makes a programmin