Last week I asked...
On Thu, Feb 01, 2001 at 01:51:56PM +, Tim Bunce wrote:
> Can anyone recommend extra gcc options to squeeze the last ounce of
> performance out of code (perl and apache in this case) on Intel?
>
> I don't mind tying the code down to one cpu type or loosing the ability
> t
[Thanks for all the feedback on this from everyone.]
On Thu, Feb 01, 2001 at 05:20:11PM +, G.W. Haywood wrote:
>
> The compiler isn't the place to look for performance gains. Look to
> your system architecture, Perl code. See if you can code the things
> that get executed the most in C. U
This isn't the best place to ask these questions.
Steve Fink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>And you'd probably want -march=i686 (or whatever CPU you're using).
Not necessarily. gcc and ia32 is weird that way.
I would use whatever Linus & co. decided to use for the kernel on that
arch in quest
Tim Bunce wrote:
>
> Can anyone recommend extra gcc options to squeeze the last ounce of
> performance out of code (perl and apache in this case) on Intel?
>
> I don't mind tying the code down to one cpu type or loosing the ability
> to debug etc. We're already doing -O6 and are looking for more
On Thu, Feb 01, 2001 at 01:51:56PM +, Tim Bunce wrote:
> Can anyone recommend extra gcc options to squeeze the last ounce of
> performance out of code (perl and apache in this case) on Intel?
>
> I don't mind tying the code down to one cpu type or loosing the ability
> to debug etc. We're alr
On Thu, 1 Feb 2001, Tim Bunce wrote:
> Can anyone recommend extra gcc options to squeeze the last ounce of
> performance out of code (perl and apache in this case) on Intel?
>
> I don't mind tying the code down to one cpu type or loosing the ability
> to debug etc. We're already doing -O6 and are
Hi Tim,
On Thu, 1 Feb 2001, Tim Bunce wrote:
> Can anyone recommend extra gcc options to squeeze the last ounce of
> performance out of code (perl and apache in this case) on Intel?
>
> I don't mind tying the code down to one cpu type or loosing the ability
> to debug etc. We're already doing -
