Re: Module Function Name Issue

2000-08-27 Thread Ken Williams
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Philip Molter) wrote: >I have a module with some code like this: > > package Object; > sub new

Re: Module Function Name Issue

2000-08-26 Thread Stas Bekman
On Sat, 26 Aug 2000, Philip Molter wrote: > On Sat, Aug 26, 2000 at 05:22:27PM +0200, Stas Bekman wrote: > > : The following is a known kludge, but it doesn't seem to apply in your > : case (I thought you might use it in PerlHandler) > : > : =head1 More package name related issues > : > : If y

Re: Module Function Name Issue

2000-08-26 Thread Philip Molter
On Sat, Aug 26, 2000 at 05:22:27PM +0200, Stas Bekman wrote: : The following is a known kludge, but it doesn't seem to apply in your : case (I thought you might use it in PerlHandler) : : =head1 More package name related issues : : If you have the following: : : PerlHandler Apache::Work::Foo

Re: Module Function Name Issue

2000-08-26 Thread Stas Bekman
On Sat, 26 Aug 2000, Philip Molter wrote: > On Sat, Aug 26, 2000 at 01:56:18PM +0200, Stas Bekman wrote: > : On Fri, 25 Aug 2000, Philip Molter wrote: > : > : Do you have the two packages in the same file like you have presented > : below? I guess they aren't since you have '1;' just before the

Re: Module Function Name Issue

2000-08-26 Thread Philip Molter
On Sat, Aug 26, 2000 at 01:56:18PM +0200, Stas Bekman wrote: : On Fri, 25 Aug 2000, Philip Molter wrote: : : Do you have the two packages in the same file like you have presented : below? I guess they aren't since you have '1;' just before the declaration : of the second package. If they live in

Re: Module Function Name Issue

2000-08-26 Thread Stas Bekman
On Fri, 25 Aug 2000, Philip Molter wrote: Do you have the two packages in the same file like you have presented below? I guess they aren't since you have '1;' just before the declaration of the second package. If they live in two different files obviously that 'use Object::SubObj' is mising, see