On Mon, 4 Feb 2002 08:37:52 -0600 , Purcell, Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED]
said:
The test is taking a 50mb file and placing it in the doc root of the IIS and
Apache/htdocs. Then just having a href link pointing to it. We have ruled
out the firewall and any networking.
I know nothing about
-Original Message-
From: Perrin Harkins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 10:10 AM
To: Purcell, Scott; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Speed of downloading problem.
I have Apache/mod_perl installed on a NT box, and I am allowing customers
to
do downloads of High
Here is the part of the httpd.conf that I believe you wanted to see.
Hmmm... I don't see anything wrong with this. It seems like the problem is
simply that Apache 1.3.x is not as fast as IIS at sending static files on
NT. Not too surprising. I've been told that Apache 2 is significantly
Hello,
I have Apache/mod_perl installed on a NT box, and I am allowing customers to
do downloads of High-Resolution assets. My problem is the speed of downloads
is about 1/3 slower than the same box running IIS. IT dept, has confirmed
that the network is not the issue, and we have ran tests for
I have Apache/mod_perl installed on a NT box, and I am allowing customers
to
do downloads of High-Resolution assets. My problem is the speed of
downloads
is about 1/3 slower than the same box running IIS.
Can you post your httpd.conf? Or at least the parts of it about threads and
processes?
Scott
See below.
Cheers
Ron Savage
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://savage.net.au/index.html
Does anyone have any clues what to try? One thought here was to go to 2.0,
but we don't know if that will screw up the mod-perl that is built for the
Apache 1.3.20 and Ron Savages mod_perl binary.
I'm
