Re: Why is Apache::PerlRun a subclass of Apache?

2000-09-28 Thread Doug MacEachern
On Fri, 25 Aug 2000, Ken Williams wrote: ken, you're right, has-a relationship is the right way to go. your patch is perfect, applied, thanks!! i guess this will break some things, like Apache::RegistryLexInfo, but changes should be minimal and RegistryNG/PerlRun is still considered

Re: Why is Apache::PerlRun a subclass of Apache?

2000-08-24 Thread Ken Williams
going through immense pain and suffering* dealing with this problem. Why is Apache::PerlRun a subclass of Apache? Shouldn't it just be a regular content handler that 'has-a' $r instead of 'is-a' Apache request? The problem I'm having is that I'm trying to write Apache::Filter as a subclass

Why is Apache::PerlRun a subclass of Apache?

2000-08-22 Thread Ken Williams
Hi, I've got to ask this because I'm going through immense pain and suffering* dealing with this problem. Why is Apache::PerlRun a subclass of Apache? Shouldn't it just be a regular content handler that 'has-a' $r instead of 'is-a' Apache request? The problem I'm having is that I'm trying