Re: current state of conf/code, feedback?

2002-10-16 Thread Perrin Harkins
Paul Simon wrote: > I was cruising with Apache::DBI, definitely better than the way I had > it, but now suddenly I'm getting this error: > > DBD::ODBC::dr FETCH failed: handle 1 is owned by thread 1e90bdc not > current thread b0f18c (handles can't be shared between threads and your > driver ma

Re: current state of conf/code, feedback?

2002-10-16 Thread Paul Simon
I was cruising with Apache::DBI, definitely better than the way I had it, but now suddenly I'm getting this error: DBD::ODBC::dr FETCH failed: handle 1 is owned by thread 1e90bdc not current thread b0f18c (handles can't be shared between threads and your driver may need a CLONE method added) at C:/

Re: current state of conf/code, feedback?

2002-10-15 Thread Paul Simon
I'm going to change the DBH code. I've witnessed a few problems so far where the DBH has crapped out. I'll try Apache::DBI.  I've been wrapping my head around the reverse proxy cache, I have it set up on my home servers. It seems to be a really good solution for caching, but it's further down the

Re: current state of conf/code, feedback?

2002-10-15 Thread Perrin Harkins
Paul Simon wrote: > I currently have CGI pages caching on the client side, which > is helping some, but I'm also going to experiment with CGI::Cache. There are some mod_perl specific version of this too, like the one from the mod_perl Developer's Cookbook (Apache::CacheContent), but these are

Re: current state of conf/code, feedback?

2002-10-15 Thread Paul Simon
I have no choice about the win thing.  I'd feel much happier using linux and mod_perl 1.x as you suggest.    I'm terribly frightened about only having 2 weeks of uptime - that's what the prayings for :) But I'm putting my faith in this very new software and the wonderful people who have been culti

Re: current state of conf/code, feedback?

2002-10-15 Thread Ged Haywood
Hi there, On Tue, 15 Oct 2002, Paul Simon wrote: > I'm currently running a pilot app under win2000 + apache 2.0.42 + perl5.8 + mod_perl. > Is there anything here that spells trouble? That win...thing? Seriously though, you're using very new software. If you want real stability I'd suggest Li

Re: current state of conf/code, feedback?

2002-10-15 Thread Rafiq Ismail
On Tue, 15 Oct 2002, Paul Simon wrote: > variables, such as the DBI handle, offer any benefits (or pain) of a > shared connection? You might want to try using Apache::DBI for persistent connections. It is completely transparent to your code, in terms of changes. R. -- Senior Programmer Bookings

current state of conf/code, feedback?

2002-10-15 Thread Paul Simon
Hi all I'm asking for some insight, guidance, comments from the list.  I'm currently running a pilot app under win2000 + apache 2.0.42 + perl5.8 + mod_perl. Mostly, it's running great, much faster than the vanilla CGI version. I think the database connection is slowing it down though...  I current