Re: shared mem [was: mod_perl advocacy project resurrection]

2000-12-07 Thread Tim Bunce
On Wed, Dec 06, 2000 at 04:24:24PM -0800, Perrin Harkins wrote: On Wed, 6 Dec 2000, Paul wrote: I was pointed to IPC::Sharable, IPC::Sharelite. I'll look at those. Take a look at IPC::MM for a shared memory hash implemented in C. Also, File::Cache is sometimes faster than the IPC

Re: shared mem [was: mod_perl advocacy project resurrection]

2000-12-07 Thread Perrin Harkins
On Thu, 7 Dec 2000, Tim Bunce wrote: On Wed, Dec 06, 2000 at 04:24:24PM -0800, Perrin Harkins wrote: On Wed, 6 Dec 2000, Paul wrote: I was pointed to IPC::Sharable, IPC::Sharelite. I'll look at those. Take a look at IPC::MM for a shared memory hash implemented in C. Also,

shared mem [was: mod_perl advocacy project resurrection]

2000-12-06 Thread Paul
--- Jim Woodgate [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [...] 2) Sharing information between the processes. There's lots of different ways to do it, but none really jumps out as an end-all solution. Is there no Apache::SharedMemory (or some such)? If not, does anyone think it would be worth the time for

Re: shared mem [was: mod_perl advocacy project resurrection]

2000-12-06 Thread G.W. Haywood
Hi Paul, On Wed, 6 Dec 2000, Paul wrote: Is there no Apache::SharedMemory (or some such)? If not, does anyone think it would be worth the time for someone (like me) to sit down and write it? (Couldn't it be done?) There be dragons. 73, Ged.

Re: shared mem [was: mod_perl advocacy project resurrection]

2000-12-06 Thread John Siracusa
On 12/6/00 3:42 PM, Paul wrote: The parent process could declare a shared memory segment at boot time. Each child's init could spawn a shared memory interface object. Wouldn't that allow for some resource pooling to be cleaner? How would that interact with per-child namespaces (if at all)?

Re: shared mem [was: mod_perl advocacy project resurrection]

2000-12-06 Thread Paul
--- "G.W. Haywood" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Paul, On Wed, 6 Dec 2000, Paul wrote: Is there no Apache::SharedMemory (or some such)? If not, does anyone think it would be worth the time for someone (like me) to sit down and write it? (Couldn't it be done?) There be dragons.

Re: shared mem [was: mod_perl advocacy project resurrection]

2000-12-06 Thread Perrin Harkins
On Wed, 6 Dec 2000, Paul wrote: I was pointed to IPC::Sharable, IPC::Sharelite. I'll look at those. Take a look at IPC::MM for a shared memory hash implemented in C. Also, File::Cache is sometimes faster than the IPC modules. I don't think any of these solve problems like sharing sockets and

Re: shared mem [was: mod_perl advocacy project resurrection]

2000-12-06 Thread Jeremy Howard
Perrin Harkins wrote: On Wed, 6 Dec 2000, Paul wrote: I was pointed to IPC::Sharable, IPC::Sharelite. I'll look at those. Take a look at IPC::MM for a shared memory hash implemented in C. Also, File::Cache is sometimes faster than the IPC modules. I don't think any of these solve