Re: [ANNOUNCE] Hello World Benchmarks, updated

2001-07-12 Thread Joshua Chamas
Joshua Chamas wrote: mod_caucho used to look a lot faster, but my testing methodology changed. I used to take the results of the second benchmark run, and publish those, but this time only ran the -test for minor caching after starting resin ( tomcat ). So, I'm guessing

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Hello World Benchmarks, updated

2001-07-11 Thread Philip Mak
One thing caught my eye; how come mod_perl handler (808.4 hits per second) performed better than HTML static (768.2 hits per second)? And sorry for my newbie-ish question, but what is the difference between mod_perl handler and Apache::Registry mod_perl?

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Hello World Benchmarks, updated

2001-07-11 Thread Perrin Harkins
Good work as usual, Joshua. mod_caucho used to look a lot faster, but my testing methodology changed. I used to take the results of the second benchmark run, and publish those, but this time only ran the -test for minor caching after starting resin ( tomcat ). So, I'm

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Hello World Benchmarks, updated

2001-07-11 Thread Perrin Harkins
Good work as usual, Joshua. mod_caucho used to look a lot faster, but my testing methodology changed. I used to take the results of the second benchmark run, and publish those, but this time only ran the -test for minor caching after starting resin ( tomcat ). So, I'm

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Hello World Benchmarks, updated

2001-07-11 Thread Joshua Chamas
Perrin Harkins wrote: mod_caucho used to look a lot faster, but my testing methodology changed. I used to take the results of the second benchmark run, and publish those, but this time only ran the -test for minor caching after starting resin ( tomcat ). So, I'm

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Hello World Benchmarks, updated

2001-07-11 Thread Perrin Harkins
I do feel that compile time matters, but really with 60 seconds and high MaxRequestsPerChild, these systems are getting plenty of compiling caching. The thing is, if mod_caucho takes 5 seconds the first time it hits each template, but is the fastest afterwards, these numbers don't give a very

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Hello World Benchmarks, updated

2001-07-11 Thread Joshua Chamas
Perrin Harkins wrote: I do feel that compile time matters, but really with 60 seconds and high MaxRequestsPerChild, these systems are getting plenty of compiling caching. The thing is, if mod_caucho takes 5 seconds the first time it hits each template, but is the fastest afterwards,

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Hello World Benchmarks, updated

2001-07-11 Thread Stas Bekman
On Wed, 11 Jul 2001, Philip Mak wrote: And sorry for my newbie-ish question, but what is the difference between mod_perl handler and Apache::Registry mod_perl? http://perl.apache.org/guide/performance.html#Apache_Registry_PerlHandler_vs_ including the benchmarks

[ANNOUNCE] Hello World Benchmarks, updated

2001-07-11 Thread Joshua Chamas
Hey, The latest Hello World benchmarks at available at: http://www.chamas.com/bench/hello.tar.gz To reproduce the BELOW results on your platform, for whatever tests are available, run: ./bench.pl -test ./bench.pl -version -time=60 --Josh DISCLAIMER: these benchmarks test only what they