> After Nick's message, we don't not seem to have reached any common
> decision whether we should continue the name/brand thread, which we
> started after:
>
> As I had volunteered to publish the summaries of these discussions, I
> waited for some time to see what the common reaction would be after a
> suggestion was made to reserve this mailing list to technical issues.
Two suggestions:
1) Ask the godfather (Doug) whether there is a point of the current
logo/brand discussion
2) If the asnswer is truly positive, move the discussion to the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] list. (which is the alias for modperl-cvs, where
all the diffs for cvs commits are being sent, maybe we should make it a
truly modperl-site, and have a pure site discussion over there?). Less
folks will be able to influence, but there is nothing we can do about
that.
Subscribing to the list is the same as for [EMAIL PROTECTED] : send mail
to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the string "subscribe modperl-site" in the
body.
I don't want anyone to take this personally, but why to kill the good will
initiative? If you don't care about the "cosmetics" part -- it's OK. The
internal parts wouldn't go broken if the decoration would be different.
But if other do care about decorations, why stopping them as long as they
try to improve things?
Please, I didn't mean to write this to start yet another thread on the
*technical* modperl list. Please subscribe to the modperl-site list where
we could discuss the "decoration" stuff without disturbing the peace of
the more technically minded dwellers of the list :)
Peace!
_______________________________________________________________________
Stas Bekman mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.stason.org/stas
Perl,CGI,Apache,Linux,Web,Java,PC http://www.stason.org/stas/TULARC
perl.apache.org modperl.sourcegarden.org perlmonth.com perl.org
single o-> + single o-+ = singlesheaven http://www.singlesheaven.com
