Re: mod_perl restart vs. graceful

2002-04-09 Thread Issac Goldstand
[snip] we could change the script to do a stop then restart, but we've seen where this method (done manually) was not 100% reliable and would sometimes require a couple of stops before we could really restart apache (never understood why this was so.) It's most likely that the stop is

Re: mod_perl restart vs. graceful

2002-04-09 Thread darren chamberlain
* Dan Wilga [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-04-09 10:19]: It's most likely that the stop is actually taking longer than you expect to process. Apachectl just sends the kill and doesn't wait around for everything to exit. Depending on what each of the children is doing, this can take awhile. So the

Re: mod_perl restart vs. graceful

2002-04-09 Thread Stephen Reppucci
Hi Darren, See my suggested refinement below (I don't like to leave the server down any longer than needed...8^): On Tue, 9 Apr 2002, darren chamberlain wrote: For exactly this reason, I always modify apachectl so that the restart option looks like: restart) timeout=${2:-5}

Re: mod_perl restart vs. graceful

2002-04-09 Thread Keith G. Murphy
Stephen Reppucci wrote: Hi Darren, See my suggested refinement below (I don't like to leave the server down any longer than needed...8^): On Tue, 9 Apr 2002, darren chamberlain wrote: For exactly this reason, I always modify apachectl so that the restart option looks like:

mod_perl restart vs. graceful

2002-04-08 Thread John E. Leon Guerrero
i'm interested in understanding the consequences of restart vs. graceful better. i've seen where the mod_perl guides recommend stopping and then restarting a mod_perl apache rather than doing a graceful restart. i only saw indications that memory does not get cleaned up cleanly if this is done.