Stas Bekman wrote:
4. Could you explain a little more about the change you made?
Let's say your perl is build using a shared library libperl.so, which normally
resides at /usr/local/lib/perl5/5.8.0/i386-freebsd/CORE/libperl.so. When you
are linking a shared perl library you need to specify:
-
Bryn Dyment wrote:
1. Should I be able to safely run 'make install' now?
Yup.
I noticed when omitting SSL from the Apache build (which resulted in a
successful 'make') that a bunch of Apache 'utility' binaries are linked
after httpd is built (a half-dozen or so). So, I'm assuming 'make install'
>> 1. Should I be able to safely run 'make install' now?
>
> Yup.
I noticed when omitting SSL from the Apache build (which resulted in a
successful 'make') that a bunch of Apache 'utility' binaries are linked
after httpd is built (a half-dozen or so). So, I'm assuming 'make install'
will install
Stas Bekman wrote:
Bryn Dyment wrote:
and you don't have:
/usr/local/lib/perl5/5.8.0/i386-freebsd/CORE/libperl.so
Right.
I assume that when you run:
perl Makefile.PL APACHE_SRC=../apache_1.3.28/src \
perl == /usr/local/bin/perl5.8.0, right?
Right. (Perl 5.8.1's installation doesn
Bryn Dyment wrote:
and you don't have:
/usr/local/lib/perl5/5.8.0/i386-freebsd/CORE/libperl.so
Right.
I assume that when you run:
perl Makefile.PL APACHE_SRC=../apache_1.3.28/src \
perl == /usr/local/bin/perl5.8.0, right?
Right. (Perl 5.8.1's installation doesn't automatically rep
I'm getting a new id with every refresh click; so, how am I suppose to
know it is the same session? Here's my code:
#!/usr/bin/perl
use Apache::Session::File;
use strict;
use warnings;
my %session;
my $sessId;
#I'm suppose to put the session id at the undef
#but how am i suppose to #know what it
On Mon, 20 Oct 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Well, I think I understand what you are saying but if I can clarify my
> understanding.
>
> My thought is that openining multiple browser (new process) will be a
> new and separate session. Is this correct?
I would fully expect so, and would be surpr
Well, I think I understand what you are saying but if I can clarify my
understanding.
My thought is that openining multiple browser (new process) will be a new
and separate session. Is this correct?
thanks
> On Mon, 20 Oct 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>> > ... If you
>> > actually start anoth
On Mon, 20 Oct 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > ... If you
> > actually start another copy of IE, that does NOT have the same
> > non-persistant cookies, and its a different session.
>
> Is this behavior the same for both Apache::Session and CGI::Session?
May I quote myself:
> > In either case,
The organizers of the ApacheCon conference (http://apachecon.com/) tell me
that if by November 1st there won't be at least 7 people registered for the
mod_perl 2.0 tutorial it'll be cancelled. So if you have planned to attend the
tutorial please register ASAP.
It's funny, but at TPC @ Portland
> ... If you
> actually start another copy of IE, that does NOT have the same
> non-persistant cookies, and its a different session.
Is this behavior the same for both Apache::Session and CGI::Session?
-thanks
> On Mon, 20 Oct 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>> Can someone comment on some advant
On Mon, 20 Oct 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Can someone comment on some advantages/disadvantages?
>
> Does opening a new browser causes a new session in either of the two?
well, in IE, cookes are relevant to processes, not to windows. That is,
you can have one process with multiple windows (f
Can someone comment on some advantages/disadvantages?
Does opening a new browser causes a new session in either of the two?
thanks
-
eMail solutions by
http://www.swanmail.com
> and you don't have:
> /usr/local/lib/perl5/5.8.0/i386-freebsd/CORE/libperl.so
Right.
> I assume that when you run:
>
> perl Makefile.PL APACHE_SRC=../apache_1.3.28/src \
>
> perl == /usr/local/bin/perl5.8.0, right?
Right. (Perl 5.8.1's installation doesn't automatically replace the
Bryn Dyment wrote:
>>Next check that it has those symbols defined.
>
> % nm /usr/local/lib/perl5/5.8.0/i386-freebsd/CORE/libperl.a | grep
> Perl_get_sv
> 21ac T Perl_get_sv
why libperl.a and not libperl.so. Do you have a static perl build?
Before any Apache stuff, but after upgrading Pe
>>Next check that it has those symbols defined.
>
> % nm /usr/local/lib/perl5/5.8.0/i386-freebsd/CORE/libperl.a | grep
> Perl_get_sv
> 21ac T Perl_get_sv
>why libperl.a and not libperl.so. Do you have a static perl build?
Before any Apache stuff, but after upgrading Perl, I have libperl
Bryn Dyment wrote:
Hi,
Stas Bekman wrote:
You do have it in the apache tree, the problem is that you overwrite
it later on. See:
http://perl.apache.org/docs/1.0/guide/install.html#mod_perl_and_mod_ssl___op
enssl
This link describes a similar build process to the one I'm using (although
I'm not h
Hi,
Stas Bekman wrote:
> You do have it in the apache tree, the problem is that you overwrite
> it later on. See:
>
http://perl.apache.org/docs/1.0/guide/install.html#mod_perl_and_mod_ssl___op
enssl
This link describes a similar build process to the one I'm using (although
I'm not having mod_per
Bryn Dyment wrote:
I have no httpd, since it failed to build (correct?). Also, I'm building in
mod_perl statically, so I assume there will be no 'libperl.so' file
(correct?).
You do have it in the apache tree, the problem is that you overwrite it later
on. See:
http://perl.apache.org/docs/1.0/gu
Hi,
Thanks for your reply. I'm a beginner, so apologies in advance if any/all
my comments are a little funny.
> 'ldd httpd' will tell you which libperl.so it's linked against.
> Check that you have that library. Next check that it has those
> symbols defined.
I have no httpd, since it failed t
Perrin Harkins wrote:
On Mon, 2003-10-20 at 18:15, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm looking for the download of Apache::Session.
There is a lot of docs on it but where is the download?
It's on CPAN. If you don't know what CPAN is, man perlmodlib and look
for "CPAN".
And http://search.cpan.org/ whic
Bryn Dyment wrote:
I've isolated this pretty well... hope someone has some insight:
After a fresh* install of FreeBSD 4.8, I can build Apache alone with
mod_ssl, and Apache alone with mod_perl (static). However, I'm getting
errors when trying to install both together.
Here are my steps:
Ray Zimmerman wrote:
At 12:03 PM -0700 10/20/03, Stas Bekman wrote:
Stas Bekman wrote:
[...]
No ... I haven't gotten that far ... I'm just trying to run a script
from the command line. The following works just fine on my Linux box
...
Hehe, that's your problem. Apache:: modules don't work from
On Mon, 2003-10-20 at 18:15, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I'm looking for the download of Apache::Session.
> There is a lot of docs on it but where is the download?
It's on CPAN. If you don't know what CPAN is, man perlmodlib and look
for "CPAN".
- Perrin
On Mon, 2003-10-20 at 18:15, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I'm looking for the download of Apache::Session.
> There is a lot of docs on it but where is the download?
It's on CPAN. If you don't know what CPAN is, man perlmodlib and look
for "CPAN".
- Perrin
I've isolated this pretty well... hope someone has some insight:
After a fresh* install of FreeBSD 4.8, I can build Apache alone with
mod_ssl, and Apache alone with mod_perl (static). However, I'm getting
errors when trying to install both together.
Here are my steps:
tar -xzf apache_1.
I'm looking for the download of Apache::Session.
There is a lot of docs on it but where is the download?
thanks
-
eMail solutions by
http://www.swanmail.com
Just got this error message and thought I'd share:
Not Found
The requested URL
/adi/theregister.co.uk/webhome;area=webhome;tile=5;sz=336x280;ord=8311782482
617662 was not found on this server.
Apache/2.0.47 (Win32
At 12:03 PM -0700 10/20/03, Stas Bekman wrote:
Stas Bekman wrote:
[...]
No ... I haven't gotten that far ... I'm just trying to run a
script from the command line. The following works just fine on my
Linux box ...
Hehe, that's your problem. Apache:: modules don't work from the
command line, si
Stas Bekman wrote:
[...]
No ... I haven't gotten that far ... I'm just trying to run a script
from the command line. The following works just fine on my Linux box ...
Hehe, that's your problem. Apache:: modules don't work from the command
line, since the modperl/apache runtime environment is no
Ray Zimmerman wrote:
At 11:12 AM -0700 10/20/03, Stas Bekman wrote:
Ray Zimmerman wrote:
I have perl-5.8.0 installed on Mac OS X 10.2.8 in /usr/local with no
problems.
The other day I installed Apache::Scoreboard but when I try running ...
#!/usr/bin/perl -w
use strict;
use Apache::Scoreboard;
At 11:12 AM -0700 10/20/03, Stas Bekman wrote:
Ray Zimmerman wrote:
I have perl-5.8.0 installed on Mac OS X 10.2.8 in /usr/local with
no problems.
The other day I installed Apache::Scoreboard but when I try running ...
#!/usr/bin/perl -w
use strict;
use Apache::Scoreboard;
1;
... I get ...
dyld
Original Message
Subject:Re: Stupid question of the day...
Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2003 18:28:04 -
From: Randy Trahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Shannon Eric Peevey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Hi Shannon,
I was reading your post from June 25 concerning authenNIS. I am on
Ray Zimmerman wrote:
I have perl-5.8.0 installed on Mac OS X 10.2.8 in /usr/local with no
problems.
The other day I installed Apache::Scoreboard but when I try running ...
#!/usr/bin/perl -w
use strict;
use Apache::Scoreboard;
1;
... I get ...
dyld: perl Undefined symbols:
_ap_rwrite
_ap_send_h
Following our discussion of what kind 'our'-declared vars are, it's
interesting that today on p5p there is this thread where all kind of
/(package|file) scope (lexical)? variable/ are discussed.
http://www.xray.mpe.mpg.de/mailing-lists/perl5-porters/2003-10/msg00912.html
___
I have perl-5.8.0 installed on Mac OS X 10.2.8 in /usr/local with no problems.
The other day I installed Apache::Scoreboard but when I try running ...
#!/usr/bin/perl -w
use strict;
use Apache::Scoreboard;
1;
... I get ...
dyld: perl Undefined symbols:
_ap_rwrite
_ap_send_http_header
_ap_set_con
36 matches
Mail list logo
