switch to a lightweight proxy + httpd on port 80. i like nginx
because its had much fewer critical bugs than lighttpd. others like
lighty. either will be fine - they'll free up apache to deal with
content generation and you'll see a ginormous performance boost off
that . you
Hi Charlie,
-Original Message-
From: Charlie Katz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 30 March 2007 19:00
To: modperl@perl.apache.org
Cc: Perrin Harkins; Shah, Sagar: IT (LDN);
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Client Research Development
Subject: Re: Insecure dependency in eval
On 4/16/07, Kelvin Wu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
but noticed sometimes cpu usage goes up to 30, and there are 80 httpd...
can't even log into mysql because 'too many connections', have to restart
apache and mysql.
Have you set MaxClients on your mod_perl server to something that
won't cause your
On Apr 17, 2007, at 3:55 AM, Clinton Gormley wrote:
Must disagree with you about pound http://www.apsis.ch/pound/
index_html
being a PITA to configure and maintain.
Pound is really easy to configure, fast as all hell, and just never
goes
down. I've been using it for about 3 years now and
On 4/17/07, Clinton Gormley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
is it reasonable to serve your static files from a mod_perl server, as
long as you have a proxy/pound/squid in front?
Yes, but spending no time in mod_perl for a static file is better than
spending a little time, and the files will be served
Hi there,
just answering my own question after some weeks ;)
I had problems authenticating Windows Vista Internet Explorer clients
(wrong password).
Now I found the solution in a note on the module's homepage
http://modntlm.sourceforge.net/
I quote it here for the archive, basically it says
On Tue, 17 Apr 2007 10:48:57 -0400
Perrin Harkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 4/17/07, Clinton Gormley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
is it reasonable to serve your static files from a mod_perl server,
as long as you have a proxy/pound/squid in front?
Yes, but spending no time in mod_perl for a
Hi,
I have configuration:
apache-2.0.59
mod_perl-2.0.3
Directory /somedir/htdocs
PerlAuthzHandler MyModule::authorize
and in authorize:
if ...
$r-handler('perl-script');
$r-set_handlers( (MP2 ? 'PerlResponseHandler' : 'PerlHandler') =
\somefunc );
If url is / all ok - authorize
Just wanted to let you know that I found the problem. I had an error in
my code where I was accidentally trying to put a read lock on a file
where I had not properly closed the write lock. This condition occurred
in error handling code and it was hard to find.
Anyway I was happy to learn that
On Mon, 2007-04-16 at 12:21 -0700, Will Fould wrote:
Hi,
I have a service that is currently running a basic LAMP stack with
mod_perl and life has been good!
The site running has been getting very busy and I've ordered a second
machine with intention to move the database off that machine
On 4/17/07, Rafael Caceres [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There is a consideration, regarding using a proxy or a different server,
that has not been brought up: If there is mod_perl based access control
for the static files, then it's basically impossible not to go through a
mod_perl server to serve
The uploaded file
Apache-Peek-1.07.tar.gz
has entered CPAN as
file: $CPAN/authors/id/P/PG/PGOLLUCCI/Apache-Peek-1.07.tar.gz
size: 49951 bytes
md5: a259e9065eed9f0fcbfcf55cb5affc07
CHANGES:
=head 1.07 Tue Apr 17 15:00:55 PDT 2007
- Fix invalid prereq check of mod_perl.pm vs
Hello,
I'm having trouble with PerlAuthenHandler.
The symptom is that in a browser (Firefox at least), I'm prompted for
a password the first time I visit a page. If I enter it incorrectly,
I'm not prompted again, but instead just see the error page.
The cause seems to be that when mod_perl
Scott Gifford [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[...]
The cause seems to be that when mod_perl gets an Authorization
header in the request, it doesn't supply a WWW-Authenticate header
in the response.
Nevermind, found it, the solution was to call:
$r-note_basic_auth_failure();
Scott.
14 matches
Mail list logo
