hello,
we have some mp1 programs including both handlers and registry scripts,run
for long days.
since apache2 is better than apache1.3, we have made the choice to upgrade
the mp1 programs to mp2.
Is there any easy way or guide to do it? thank you.
National Bingo Night. Play along for
Dileep Eduri wrote:
Hello Folks,
I am using Apache/2.2.6 (Win32) mod_perl/2.0.3 Perl/v5.8.8 configured
...
Here is log entry for that:
[Tue Nov 06 20:42:23 2007] [notice] Parent: child process exited with status
9 -- Restarting.
Seeking for desparate help..
regards,
Dileep
I think this is A
Hello Folks,
I am using Apache/2.2.6 (Win32) mod_perl/2.0.3 Perl/v5.8.8 configured
I have following entries for mod_perl in httpd.conf
Alias /perl/ C:/Apache2.2/perl/
PerlModule ModPerl::Registry
SetHandler perl-script
PerlHandlerModPerl::Registry
Options+ExecCGI
Pe
> > I have googled around quite a bit but haven't found anything for
> > this.
> >
> > Using Apache 2.2.3, mod_perl 2.0.2-2.4, both are from Debian
> > packages.
> >
> > I am not using handlers, just scripts, and so I have nothing to
> > shift.
> > Also, the Apache2::requestutil stuff doesn't work
I forgot to mention, lighttpd consumes about 12 megs of RAM with my config.
It's very small because it uses non-blocking sockets to do everything with a
single thread.
On Nov 6, 2007 1:17 PM, Mark Maunder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I can't overstate the efficiency gains from a reverse proxy con
I can't overstate the efficiency gains from a reverse proxy config with
mod_perl and a very light front-end reverse proxy. As I mentioned I'm using
lighttpd as the front-end and apache 2.2 with mod_perl 2 as the back end.
Here are two screenshots to illustrate what I'm talking about.
The first is
On Nov 6, 2007 3:37 PM, Collin Monahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I have googled around quite a bit but haven't found anything for this.
>
> Using Apache 2.2.3, mod_perl 2.0.2-2.4, both are from Debian packages.
>
> I am not using handlers, just scripts, and so I have nothing to shift.
> Also,
Carl Johnstone wrote:
> Michael Peters wrote:
>> mod_auth_tkt. You can set the authorization ticket with mod_perl and
>> then just
>> let mod_auth_tkt handle it on the non-mod_perl apache. It's extremely
>> light
>> weight and really fast.
>>
> Got this on my "to implement soon" list - any tips/
Michael Peters wrote:
mod_auth_tkt. You can set the authorization ticket with mod_perl and then just
let mod_auth_tkt handle it on the non-mod_perl apache. It's extremely light
weight and really fast.
Got this on my "to implement soon" list - any tips/caveats?
Carl
Gary Sewell wrote:
I am interested in the reverse proxy idea. We currently also run a static
image/js/css server and a static php server that runs the static pages we
are able to crate which is very few, 99% of our pages are dynamic and change
every second. Due to the bulk of our code (100Mb @ 32
I have googled around quite a bit but haven't found anything for this.
Using Apache 2.2.3, mod_perl 2.0.2-2.4, both are from Debian packages.
I am not using handlers, just scripts, and so I have nothing to shift.
Also, the Apache2::requestutil stuff doesn't work.
$r = shift; # $r will be undefi
Any chance there is a methodology with which I may identify
when a browser is sending me a retry-with-authorization request?
Intention: To issue a response which ultimately brings up the
browser's log-in dialog. Yes, I'm trying to implement the already
well-known inability to 'log-out' after brow
On Nov 6, 2007 1:41 PM, Gary Sewell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The discrepancies I mentioned in the size of each of our apache instances is
> something I don't think I personally be able to get to the bottom of, I have
> attempted Apache::Status, this gives out our loaded modules etc but not
> sp
While some of the things you mention (caching, etc.) can be a purpose
for the reverse proxy server, the key reason is to provide a buffer for
all of the communication bits with clients that are not related to
processing the actual request. The front servers take the initial
connection from the
Octavian Rasnita wrote:
> If you all recommend using mod_perl with a reverse proxy, then I am sure
> you can help me by telling how to protect the static files offered for
> download.
>
> I have many files that are generated permanently from 10 to 10 minutes,
> with names like 2007-11-06-10-10-00
I forget the exact syntax, but I'd use DateTime.
See datetime.perl.org for more exhausting details.
Drew
On Nov 6, 2007, at 10:09 AM, Tyler Bird wrote:
HI List,
Does anyone know the formula to convert from GMT to CST
or any functions used by perl to get the time in CST?
Tyler
Hi,
If you all recommend using mod_perl with a reverse proxy, then I am sure you
can help me by telling how to protect the static files offered for download.
I have many files that are generated permanently from 10 to 10 minutes, with
names like 2007-11-06-10-10-00.tar.gz and I would like to
Hi again,
As I mentioned we run 4 mod perl servers, theya re all apache 1.3 , 2 are
64-bit 2 are 32-bit machines.
The discrepancies I mentioned in the size of each of our apache instances is
something I don't think I personally be able to get to the bottom of, I have
attempted Apache::Status, thi
HI List,
Does anyone know the formula to convert from GMT to CST
or any functions used by perl to get the time in CST?
Tyler
On Sun, 4 Nov 2007 21:28:34 -0800
"Mark Maunder" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I run lighttpd as reverse proxy in front of mod_perl configured with
> prefork. I average 100 to 200 concurrent connections on lighttpd and
> need 4 mod_perl processes with keepalive disabled to service all
> those reque
20 matches
Mail list logo
