framework for modperl applications

2008-07-17 Thread pennyyh
I found that Catalyst is too huge to use. Other than Catalyst, do you have any other framework suggested for MP applications? thanks. --penny

Re: framework for modperl applications

2008-07-17 Thread Rolf Schaufelberger
Am Donnerstag, 17. Juli 2008 17:52:58 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I found that Catalyst is too huge to use. Other than Catalyst, do you have any other framework suggested for MP applications? thanks. --penny I'm using HTML::Mason and MasonX::WebApp along with DBIx::Class as the main parts

Re: framework for modperl applications

2008-07-17 Thread Fred Moyer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I found that Catalyst is too huge to use. Other than Catalyst, do you have any other framework suggested for MP applications? thanks. --penny Apache::Dispatch (http://search.cpan.org/dist/Apache-Dispatch) is on lightweight end of the spectrum, one step removed from

Re: framework for modperl applications

2008-07-17 Thread W. Tyler Gee
On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 10:30 AM, Fred Moyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I found that Catalyst is too huge to use. Other than Catalyst, do you have any other framework suggested for MP applications? thanks. My understanding is that Catalyst is as light as you want it

Re: framework for modperl applications

2008-07-17 Thread Foo JH
Most will argue that it's not considered a framework per se, but I like HTML::Template. It's more of a templating engine really. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I found that Catalyst is too huge to use. Other than Catalyst, do you have any other framework suggested for MP applications? thanks.

Re: framework for modperl applications

2008-07-17 Thread Michael Peters
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I found that Catalyst is too huge to use. Catalyst is big because of all the things it can do. If you want all of that stuff for free you need a big framework. Other than Catalyst, do you have any other framework suggested for MP applications? I prefer

Re: framework for modperl applications

2008-07-17 Thread Jeff Nokes
I like Mason a lot (HTML::Mason). We use Mason mostly for it's component execution chain, attributes, subexec, and a few other features. Also, we don't use Mason's template features at all, we choose to use HTML::Template for that. My $0.02, - Jeff - Original Message From: [EMAIL

Re: Problem getting started

2008-07-17 Thread Perrin Harkins
On Sun, Jul 13, 2008 at 1:21 AM, John M. Dlugosz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: OK, when I defined $r as you did, it worked. For documentation, I was looking at here: http://search.cpan.org/~joesuf/libapreq2-2.08/glue/perl/lib/Apache2/Request.pm Hi John, That SYNOPSIS is more like a set of

Re: mod_proxy_html (reverse proxy) functionality for Apache 1

2008-07-17 Thread Perrin Harkins
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 12:06 PM, Jim Brandt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Are there any other solutions for Apache 1 before I start hacking on this module? The Apache::Filter stuff does work, but I don't see any advantage to using that in this case. You'd still have to do the proxy fetch yourself.

Re: persistent database connection - Apache::DBI with mod_perl

2008-07-17 Thread Perrin Harkins
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 11:04 PM, Chris Zhuang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: But how to setup Komodo 3.1 to debug mod_perl? You should probably ask the Komodo support list about that. Apache::DB seems to be working. - Perrin

Re: framework for modperl applications

2008-07-17 Thread Perrin Harkins
On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 11:52 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Other than Catalyst, do you have any other framework suggested for MP applications? http://perl.apache.org/products/app-server.html - Perrin