Re: Building 2.0.9-dev on Windows w. httpd 2.4

(and now forwarded to the list) Hi Am 06.10.2014 um 18:54 schrieb Steve Hay: You need to build perl yourself using VC/nmake too or else find some other binary build using VC/nmake because ActivePerl actually uses gcc/dmake just like Strawberry Perl these days... *Ouch*, I didn't realize. Build

Re: Building 2.0.9-dev on Windows w. httpd 2.4

You need to build perl yourself using VC/nmake too or else find some other binary build using VC/nmake because ActivePerl actually uses gcc/dmake just like Strawberry Perl these days... On 6 October 2014 15:23, Mathieu Simon wrote: > Hi > > 2014-10-02 10:27 GMT+02:00 Mathieu Simon : >>> >>> >> Ah

Re: Building 2.0.9-dev on Windows w. httpd 2.4

Hi Richard That sounds interesting - the most time I've spent installing GB's of Windows developer tools. Compiling all from scratch (I tried it a bit, but also failed - guess: PEBKAC) wasn't in the scope, so I'd really like to give that download a test, unfortunately the link doesn't work "Please

RE: Building 2.0.9-dev on Windows w. httpd 2.4

When I did this I built everything: Perl, httpd, and mod_perl myself using VC2008 without using the IDE. Richard Kandarian http://www.lanl.gov/cgi-bin/fonelink.pl/085598 My node in the Web: http://www.kandarian.com From: Mathieu Simon [mailto:mathieu@gmail.com] Se

Re: Building 2.0.9-dev on Windows w. httpd 2.4

Hi 2014-10-02 10:27 GMT+02:00 Mathieu Simon : > >> Aha, so I guess a Visual Studio is required then? > Let me give it a whirl then. :-) > So I had the oppoortunity to give this a bit a test and from what I looks now the situation is a bit in dare state for building mod_perl for httpd 2.4.x on Win