Re: Future MPM Support?

Does using mod_perl properly allow you to use mpm_event or mpm_worker? On Thu, Jun 7, 2018 at 9:19 PM, Dr James Smith wrote: > Unfortunately Plack (and Catalyst especially) are a fairly poor comparison > to using mod_perl properly {unfortunately very few people do so} I've > looked at Dancer and

Re: Future MPM Support?

Unfortunately Plack (and Catalyst especially) are a fairly poor comparison to using mod_perl properly {unfortunately very few people do so} I've looked at Dancer and Catalyst - both are OK at what they do - but they don't really handle things in the really clean easy way that mod_perl does {if

Re: Future MPM Support?

Moving your method handlers to the framework. I like catalyst. Stand on the shoulders of giants. Mojolicious makes me itch. > On 7 Jun 2018, at 19:21, John Dunlap wrote: > > What is involved in porting an application from mod_perl to starman? > > On Thu, Jun 7, 2018 at 6:18 PM, Clive Eisen wr

Re: Future MPM Support?

What is involved in porting an application from mod_perl to starman? On Thu, Jun 7, 2018 at 6:18 PM, Clive Eisen wrote: > On 7 Jun 2018, at 19:13, David Hodgkinson wrote: > > No. Different concept. > > On 7 Jun 2018, at 18:52, John Dunlap wrote: > > Is Plack backwards compatible with mod_perl?

Re: Future MPM Support?

> On 7 Jun 2018, at 19:13, David Hodgkinson wrote: > > No. Different concept. > > On 7 Jun 2018, at 18:52, John Dunlap mailto:j...@lariat.co>> > wrote: > >> Is Plack backwards compatible with mod_perl? >> >> On Thu, Jun 7, 2018 at 5:44 PM, David Hodgkinson > > wrot

Re: Future MPM Support?

No. Different concept. > On 7 Jun 2018, at 18:52, John Dunlap wrote: > > Is Plack backwards compatible with mod_perl? > >> On Thu, Jun 7, 2018 at 5:44 PM, David Hodgkinson wrote: >> We’re all about the Plack these days. >> >>> On 7 Jun 2018, at 18:21, John Dunlap wrote: >>> >>> Are there a

Re: Future MPM Support?

Is Plack backwards compatible with mod_perl? On Thu, Jun 7, 2018 at 5:44 PM, David Hodgkinson wrote: > We’re all about the Plack these days. > > On 7 Jun 2018, at 18:21, John Dunlap wrote: > > Are there any plans for mod_perl to support mpm_event, mpm_worker? Every > time I try to use something

Re: Future MPM Support?

We’re all about the Plack these days. > On 7 Jun 2018, at 18:21, John Dunlap wrote: > > Are there any plans for mod_perl to support mpm_event, mpm_worker? Every time > I try to use something other than mpm_prefork I am plagued by segfaults. > > -- > John Dunlap > CTO | Lariat > > Direct: >

Future MPM Support?

Are there any plans for mod_perl to support mpm_event, mpm_worker? Every time I try to use something other than mpm_prefork I am plagued by segfaults. -- John Dunlap *CTO | Lariat * *Direct:* *j...@lariat.co * *Customer Service:* 877.268.6667 supp...@lariat.co