1. Problem Description:
make test fails to start the httpd - failure message:
[error] Insecure directory in $ENV{PATH} while running with -T switch at
/opt/apache/perl/.cpan/build/mod_perl-2.0.4-xDMqqj/Apache-Test/lib/Apache/TestConfig.pm
line 1108
[error] Can't load Perl file:
/opt/apache/per
-8<-- Start Bug Report
8<--1. Problem Description:
Getting error during
make test. Pattern match error in Test.pm line 500 - my @digits = shift =~
m/(\d+)\.?(\d*)\.?(\d*)/;
Ran
below:
t/TEST -clean
t/TEST -verbose t/api/aplog.t
t/logs/error_log
Hi,
I'm new to this list and trying to compile modperl for Apache2.
(I've done this some time ago for modperl 1.26 and Apache 1.3.22.)
I'm using Perl 5.8.5 under AIX 4.3.3. My compiler is vac 5.0.2.8.
Everything compiles well and Apache2 is running wonderful on it's own.
I've done the followi
Rippetoe, David wrote:
> -8<-- Start Bug Report 8<--
> 1. Problem Description:
>
> Getting error during make test. Pattern match error in Test.pm line 500
> - my @digits = shift =~ m/(\d+)\.?(\d*)\.?(\d*)/;
I'm not sure when/where/how, but this is fixed in
-8<-- Start Bug Report 8<--
1. Problem Description:
During 'make test' I see errors and I don't know what to do to solve
it. There's no error_log created.
/em/opt/wserve/bin/httpd -d /em/tmp/downloads/mod_perl-2.0.3/t -f
/em/tmp/downloads/mod_perl-2
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm new to this list and trying to compile modperl for Apache2.
(I've done this some time ago for modperl 1.26 and Apache 1.3.22.)
I'm using Perl 5.8.5 under AIX 4.3.3. My compiler is vac 5.0.2.8.
Johannes, to submit problem report please use:
http://perl.apache.org/bugs/
.
-8<-- Start Bug Report 8<--
1. Problem Description:
t/api/access21..6
# Running under perl version 5.008006 for darwin
# Current time local: Thu Aug 11 12:36:04 2005
# Current time GMT: Thu Aug 11 19:36:04 2005
# Using Test.pm version 1.25
# Using Apac
Hi,
I've managed something new: make test ist running after deactivating every
"LoadModule" in /www/apache2/httpd.conf
from which make test generates it's own httpd.conf. Now the tests are
running.
So it seems to be a problem with the LoadModule-order. The following
modules are built into http
Hi Stas,
I tried the Timeout-value and as you thought it hasn't any influence
because with
the prefork-model the server needs around 26secs to startup.
I found something new. As I commented out every module I tried to figure
out
which one is the bad one, so I activated one after the other and
Michael G Schwern wrote:
-8<-- Start Bug Report 8<--
1. Problem Description:
t/api/access21..6
# Running under perl version 5.008006 for darwin
# Current time local: Thu Aug 11 12:36:04 2005
# Current time GMT: Thu Aug 11 19:36:04 2005
# Using Test.p
On Thu, Aug 11, 2005 at 04:21:18PM -0400, Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
> What was in the t/error_log file?
Logs for running t/api/access2.t attached.
--
Michael G Schwern [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.pobox.com/~schwern
Don't try the paranormal until you know what's normal.
-- "Lord
On Thu, 11 Aug 2005, Michael G Schwern wrote:
On Thu, Aug 11, 2005 at 04:21:18PM -0400, Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
What was in the t/error_log file?
Logs for running t/api/access2.t attached.
Does the suggestion at
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=11050654061&r=1&w=2
apply and/or help?
On Thu, Aug 11, 2005 at 11:09:06PM -0500, Randy Kobes wrote:
> On Thu, 11 Aug 2005, Michael G Schwern wrote:
>
> >On Thu, Aug 11, 2005 at 04:21:18PM -0400, Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
> >>What was in the t/error_log file?
> >
> >Logs for running t/api/access2.t attached.
>
> Does the suggestion at
Michael G Schwern wrote:
On Thu, Aug 11, 2005 at 11:09:06PM -0500, Randy Kobes wrote:
On Thu, 11 Aug 2005, Michael G Schwern wrote:
On Thu, Aug 11, 2005 at 04:21:18PM -0400, Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
What was in the t/error_log file?
Logs for running t/api/access2.t attached.
Does the
Michael G Schwern wrote:
On Fri, Aug 12, 2005 at 07:22:34PM -0700, Stas Bekman wrote:
Replacing "Allow from localhost" with "Allow from All" did it.
Why the localhost setting doesn't work?
Dunno. localhost looks ok from my end.
$ host localhost
localhost has address 127.0.0.1
$ hostname
Or may be we could just:
Index: t/response/TestAPI/access2.pm
===
--- t/response/TestAPI/access2.pm (revision 225490)
+++ t/response/TestAPI/access2.pm (working copy)
@@ -98,9 +98,7 @@
# needed to test $r-
Michael G Schwern wrote:
On Fri, Aug 12, 2005 at 08:47:30PM -0700, Stas Bekman wrote:
e.g. inside a handler t/response/TestAPI/access2.pm
Put it in there and didn't see any extra output in STDERR or error.log.
what test are you running?
t/TEST t/api/access2.t
error_log:
myip: 127.0.0.1
On Fri, Aug 12, 2005 at 07:22:34PM -0700, Stas Bekman wrote:
> >Replacing "Allow from localhost" with "Allow from All" did it.
>
> Why the localhost setting doesn't work?
Dunno. localhost looks ok from my end.
$ host localhost
localhost has address 127.0.0.1
$ hostname
windhund.schwern.org
On Fri, Aug 12, 2005 at 08:47:30PM -0700, Stas Bekman wrote:
> e.g. inside a handler t/response/TestAPI/access2.pm
Put it in there and didn't see any extra output in STDERR or error.log.
--
Michael G Schwern [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.pobox.com/~schwern
You know what the chain of comm
On Fri, Aug 12, 2005 at 09:19:13PM -0700, Stas Bekman wrote:
> >On Fri, Aug 12, 2005 at 08:47:30PM -0700, Stas Bekman wrote:
> >
> >>e.g. inside a handler t/response/TestAPI/access2.pm
> >
> >
> >Put it in there and didn't see any extra output in STDERR or error.log.
>
> what test are you running?
Michael G Schwern wrote:
On Fri, Aug 12, 2005 at 09:19:13PM -0700, Stas Bekman wrote:
On Fri, Aug 12, 2005 at 08:47:30PM -0700, Stas Bekman wrote:
e.g. inside a handler t/response/TestAPI/access2.pm
Put it in there and didn't see any extra output in STDERR or error.log.
what test are yo
On Mon, Aug 15, 2005 at 05:54:53PM -0700, Stas Bekman wrote:
> Where does it go then? Are you sure you've applied the patch and the warn
> statement is there?
Grepping the source tree the only instance of "myip" is in
t/response/TestAPI/access2.pm which I put in there according to your
instruct
Michael G Schwern wrote:
On Mon, Aug 15, 2005 at 05:54:53PM -0700, Stas Bekman wrote:
Where does it go then? Are you sure you've applied the patch and the warn
statement is there?
Grepping the source tree the only instance of "myip" is in
t/response/TestAPI/access2.pm which I put in there
Stas Bekman wrote:
> Or may be we could just:
>
> Index: t/response/TestAPI/access2.pm
> ===
> --- t/response/TestAPI/access2.pm (revision 225490)
> +++ t/response/TestAPI/access2.pm (working copy)
> @@ -98,9 +98,7 @@
>
Michael G Schwern wrote:
On Mon, Aug 15, 2005 at 05:54:53PM -0700, Stas Bekman wrote:
Where does it go then? Are you sure you've applied the patch and the warn
statement is there?
Grepping the source tree the only instance of "myip" is in
t/response/TestAPI/access2.pm which I put in there
On Tue, Aug 16, 2005 at 04:05:21PM -0700, Stas Bekman wrote:
> Looks fine. Dunno why it doesn't end up in the right place. Do you load
> some module that overrides SIG{__WARN__}?
Nope.
--
Michael G Schwern [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.pobox.com/~schwern
'All anyone gets in a mirror is
1. Problem Description:
Trying to build and install mod_perl from source. Have already built
perl and apache 2.2 from source, they both seem to be fine (latest
stable, both). But it is my first cut at this, so I could have made a
dumb error. Anyhow, all help appreciated.
"make test" fails. Here
Daniel McBrearty wrote:
1. Problem Description:
Trying to build and install mod_perl from source. Have already built
perl and apache 2.2 from source, they both seem to be fine (latest
stable, both). But it is my first cut at this, so I could have made a
dumb error. Anyhow, all help appreciated.
Summary of problem: following failed during "make test" for
mod_perl-1.99_16:
t/filter/both_str_con_add.t
t/protocol/echo_block.t
t/protocol/pseudo_http.t
The platform:
- OpenBSD 3.5-stable (GENERIC) #0: Thu Aug 12 23:59:05 EDT 2004 (i.e.,
patched)
- perl v5.8.2 built for i386-openbsd (standa
I've seen these individually in the list here, but haven't found any
answers yet. The main
question I have is: is it safe to ignore these failures and go ahead
with "make install"?
-Ollie
-8<-- Start Bug Report 8<--
1. Problem Description:
Failed Test
Fisher, James L. wrote:
Summary of problem: following failed during "make test" for
mod_perl-1.99_16:
t/filter/both_str_con_add.t
t/protocol/echo_block.t
t/protocol/pseudo_http.t
The platform:
- OpenBSD 3.5-stable (GENERIC) #0: Thu Aug 12 23:59:05 EDT 2004 (i.e.,
patched)
It's an bug in libapr
Stas Bekman wrote:
Fisher, James L. wrote:
Summary of problem: following failed during "make test" for
mod_perl-1.99_16:
t/filter/both_str_con_add.t
t/protocol/echo_block.t
t/protocol/pseudo_http.t
The platform:
- OpenBSD 3.5-stable (GENERIC) #0: Thu Aug 12 23:59:05 EDT 2004 (i.e.,
patched)
It
On Fri, 9 Feb 2007, Ollie wrote:
I've seen these individually in the list here, but haven't found any answers
yet. The main
question I have is: is it safe to ignore these failures and go ahead with
"make install"?
I _think_ you should be ok here. Gozer posted a patch [1] a few days ago
that
On Feb 9, 2007, at 12:52 PM, Fred Moyer wrote:
Can you run ./t/TEST -VERBOSE ./t/apache/daemon.t and post the
output along with the t/logs/error_log output?
Thanks for your reply. Here's the information you requested, also
with server_const.t test output.
-Ollie
hostname:/app/ollie/down
Well, I went ahead with the "make install", hoping for the best.
Here's the results:
server:/usr/local/apache2[10 ]# ./bin/apachectl configtest
httpd: Could not reliably determine the server's fully qualified
domain name, using xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx for ServerName
Syntax OK
server:/usr/local/a
Hi,
I have a few problems with mp 2.0.3 against the http2 trunk.
1)
/home/mrstlee/Projects/mod_perl-2.0.3/xs/Apache2/RequestUtil/Apache2__RequestUtil.h:157:
structure has no member named `ap_auth_type'
/home/mrstlee/Projects/mod_perl-2.0.3/xs/Apache2/RequestUtil/Apache2__RequestUtil.h:158:
struct
36 matches
Mail list logo
