On Thu, 26 Sep 2019 at 16:17, Damyan Ivanov wrote:
>
> -=| Steve Hay, 26.09.2019 09:02:19 +0100 |=-
> > Before I actually roll out an RC3, please can you confirm that
> > switching to FINFO_SIZE as per this patch works for you (it does for
> > me):
> > …
>
> This works for me:
>
> # testing : $r->
Hello Steve,
I have tested it in two ways:
1) Installation via freebsd port system via fooling the port about
distro checksum.
Installed successful on
1) FreeBSD 11.2-STABLE
2) apache-2.4.37
3) perl 5, version 26
Installation via port is made without modifying t/ fil
-=| Steve Hay, 26.09.2019 09:02:19 +0100 |=-
> Before I actually roll out an RC3, please can you confirm that
> switching to FINFO_SIZE as per this patch works for you (it does for
> me):
> …
This works for me:
# testing : $r->finfo
# expected: 7278
# received: 7278
ok 44
(the rest of the tests
on 2019/9/26 18:32, André Warnier (tomcat) wrote:
Not being able myself to contribute really to this process, I did not
comment on the previous emails here.
But as a grateful user of mod_perl for many years, I just want to
express my immense gratitude to Steve and all other people who
contri
Guys,
Not being able myself to contribute really to this process, I did not comment on the
previous emails here.
But as a grateful user of mod_perl for many years, I just want to express my immense
gratitude to Steve and all other people who contribute to keep this project and product
alive an
On Thu, 26 Sep 2019 at 06:54, Damyan Ivanov wrote:
>
> -=| Damyan Ivanov, 25.09.2019 23:06:56 +0300 |=-
> > -=| Steve Hay, 25.09.2019 08:34:07 +0100 |=-
> > > What happens if you revert the change in that file? I.e. Change
> > > FINFO_NAME back to FINFO_NORM on line 168, and on line 18 (the
> > >
-=| Damyan Ivanov, 25.09.2019 23:06:56 +0300 |=-
> -=| Steve Hay, 25.09.2019 08:34:07 +0100 |=-
> > What happens if you revert the change in that file? I.e. Change
> > FINFO_NAME back to FINFO_NORM on line 168, and on line 18 (the
> > APR::Const -compile line)? Does that fix it for you?
>
> With t
What happens if you revert the change in that file? I.e. Change
FINFO_NAME back to FINFO_NORM on line 168, and on line 18 (the
APR::Const -compile line)? Does that fix it for you?
With that change all the request_rec tests run and pass.
Adam
-=| Steve Hay, 25.09.2019 08:34:07 +0100 |=-
> What happens if you revert the change in that file? I.e. Change
> FINFO_NAME back to FINFO_NORM on line 168, and on line 18 (the
> APR::Const -compile line)? Does that fix it for you?
With these two lines reverted, all tests pass for me (and the Debia
On Wed, 25 Sep 2019 at 03:59, Adam Prime wrote:
>
> Still seeing the t/api/request_rec.t failures, which do not occur with
> the same machine and same settings with 2.0.10. It's failing after the
> mtime test, before the finfo test.
>
> Test Summary Report
> ---
> t/api/request_rec
On Wed, 25 Sep 2019 at 03:59, Adam Prime wrote:
>
> Still seeing the t/api/request_rec.t failures, which do not occur with
> the same machine and same settings with 2.0.10. It's failing after the
> mtime test, before the finfo test.
>
> Test Summary Report
> ---
> t/api/request_rec
Still seeing the t/api/request_rec.t failures, which do not occur with
the same machine and same settings with 2.0.10. It's failing after the
mtime test, before the finfo test.
Test Summary Report
---
t/api/request_rec.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 43 Failed: 0)
Parse e
Please download, test, and report back on this mod_perl 2.0.11 release
candidate.
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/perl/mod_perl-2.0.11-rc2.tar.gz
MD5 = abc2c2168121a09b0fc3b6fc6adc00bd
SHA1 = 36ee7626506a3a461118b3957814dfe9331ef1de
Changes since RC1 are as follows:
Fix [CVE-2011-2767]
13 matches
Mail list logo
