Re: [SumsaultRT #1249][mp1] text-book forking code still producing zombies

2004-10-06 Thread Mark Stosberg
On 2004-10-06, Mark Stosberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>> Could setting MaxRequestsPerChild be a meaningful solution here? It >>> would seem that this would cause the Apache child processes to >>> periodically get re-created, killing related zombies in the process. >> >> If you aren't using Ma

Re: [SumsaultRT #1249][mp1] text-book forking code still producing zombies

2004-10-06 Thread Mark Stosberg
On 2004-10-06, Perrin Harkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, 2004-10-06 at 16:56, Mark Stosberg wrote: >> At your recommended, I installed strace and ran it on the hung process. >> It doesn't work. > > Hmm, maybe it's time to add some logging to your forked processes to > find out where they

Re: [SumsaultRT #1249][mp1] text-book forking code still producing zombies

2004-10-06 Thread Perrin Harkins
On Wed, 2004-10-06 at 16:56, Mark Stosberg wrote: > At your recommended, I installed strace and ran it on the hung process. > It doesn't work. Hmm, maybe it's time to add some logging to your forked processes to find out where they are getting stuck. > Could setting MaxRequestsPerChild be a meani

Re: [SumsaultRT #1249][mp1] text-book forking code still producing zombies

2004-10-06 Thread Mark Stosberg
Stas -- On 2004-10-05, Stas Bekman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > May be it's just not working on your platform. Have you tried the other > suggested solutions at: > http://perl.apache.org/docs/1.0/guide/performance.html#Avoiding_Zombie_Processes Thank you very much for the response. In the past