On Tue, Aug 16, 2005 at 04:05:21PM -0700, Stas Bekman wrote:
> Looks fine. Dunno why it doesn't end up in the right place. Do you load
> some module that overrides SIG{__WARN__}?
Nope.
--
Michael G Schwern [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.pobox.com/~schwern
'All anyone gets in a mirror is
Michael G Schwern wrote:
On Mon, Aug 15, 2005 at 05:54:53PM -0700, Stas Bekman wrote:
Where does it go then? Are you sure you've applied the patch and the warn
statement is there?
Grepping the source tree the only instance of "myip" is in
t/response/TestAPI/access2.pm which I put in there
Stas Bekman wrote:
> Or may be we could just:
>
> Index: t/response/TestAPI/access2.pm
> ===
> --- t/response/TestAPI/access2.pm (revision 225490)
> +++ t/response/TestAPI/access2.pm (working copy)
> @@ -98,9 +98,7 @@
>
Michael G Schwern wrote:
On Mon, Aug 15, 2005 at 05:54:53PM -0700, Stas Bekman wrote:
Where does it go then? Are you sure you've applied the patch and the warn
statement is there?
Grepping the source tree the only instance of "myip" is in
t/response/TestAPI/access2.pm which I put in there
On Mon, Aug 15, 2005 at 05:54:53PM -0700, Stas Bekman wrote:
> Where does it go then? Are you sure you've applied the patch and the warn
> statement is there?
Grepping the source tree the only instance of "myip" is in
t/response/TestAPI/access2.pm which I put in there according to your
instruct
Michael G Schwern wrote:
On Fri, Aug 12, 2005 at 09:19:13PM -0700, Stas Bekman wrote:
On Fri, Aug 12, 2005 at 08:47:30PM -0700, Stas Bekman wrote:
e.g. inside a handler t/response/TestAPI/access2.pm
Put it in there and didn't see any extra output in STDERR or error.log.
what test are yo
On Fri, Aug 12, 2005 at 09:19:13PM -0700, Stas Bekman wrote:
> >On Fri, Aug 12, 2005 at 08:47:30PM -0700, Stas Bekman wrote:
> >
> >>e.g. inside a handler t/response/TestAPI/access2.pm
> >
> >
> >Put it in there and didn't see any extra output in STDERR or error.log.
>
> what test are you running?
On Fri, Aug 12, 2005 at 08:47:30PM -0700, Stas Bekman wrote:
> e.g. inside a handler t/response/TestAPI/access2.pm
Put it in there and didn't see any extra output in STDERR or error.log.
--
Michael G Schwern [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.pobox.com/~schwern
You know what the chain of comm
On Fri, Aug 12, 2005 at 07:22:34PM -0700, Stas Bekman wrote:
> >Replacing "Allow from localhost" with "Allow from All" did it.
>
> Why the localhost setting doesn't work?
Dunno. localhost looks ok from my end.
$ host localhost
localhost has address 127.0.0.1
$ hostname
windhund.schwern.org
Michael G Schwern wrote:
On Fri, Aug 12, 2005 at 08:47:30PM -0700, Stas Bekman wrote:
e.g. inside a handler t/response/TestAPI/access2.pm
Put it in there and didn't see any extra output in STDERR or error.log.
what test are you running?
t/TEST t/api/access2.t
error_log:
myip: 127.0.0.1
Or may be we could just:
Index: t/response/TestAPI/access2.pm
===
--- t/response/TestAPI/access2.pm (revision 225490)
+++ t/response/TestAPI/access2.pm (working copy)
@@ -98,9 +98,7 @@
# needed to test $r-
Michael G Schwern wrote:
On Fri, Aug 12, 2005 at 07:22:34PM -0700, Stas Bekman wrote:
Replacing "Allow from localhost" with "Allow from All" did it.
Why the localhost setting doesn't work?
Dunno. localhost looks ok from my end.
$ host localhost
localhost has address 127.0.0.1
$ hostname
Michael G Schwern wrote:
On Thu, Aug 11, 2005 at 11:09:06PM -0500, Randy Kobes wrote:
On Thu, 11 Aug 2005, Michael G Schwern wrote:
On Thu, Aug 11, 2005 at 04:21:18PM -0400, Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
What was in the t/error_log file?
Logs for running t/api/access2.t attached.
Does the
On Thu, Aug 11, 2005 at 11:09:06PM -0500, Randy Kobes wrote:
> On Thu, 11 Aug 2005, Michael G Schwern wrote:
>
> >On Thu, Aug 11, 2005 at 04:21:18PM -0400, Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
> >>What was in the t/error_log file?
> >
> >Logs for running t/api/access2.t attached.
>
> Does the suggestion at
On Thu, 11 Aug 2005, Michael G Schwern wrote:
On Thu, Aug 11, 2005 at 04:21:18PM -0400, Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
What was in the t/error_log file?
Logs for running t/api/access2.t attached.
Does the suggestion at
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=11050654061&r=1&w=2
apply and/or help?
On Thu, Aug 11, 2005 at 04:21:18PM -0400, Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
> What was in the t/error_log file?
Logs for running t/api/access2.t attached.
--
Michael G Schwern [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.pobox.com/~schwern
Don't try the paranormal until you know what's normal.
-- "Lord
Michael G Schwern wrote:
-8<-- Start Bug Report 8<--
1. Problem Description:
t/api/access21..6
# Running under perl version 5.008006 for darwin
# Current time local: Thu Aug 11 12:36:04 2005
# Current time GMT: Thu Aug 11 19:36:04 2005
# Using Test.p
-8<-- Start Bug Report 8<--
1. Problem Description:
t/api/access21..6
# Running under perl version 5.008006 for darwin
# Current time local: Thu Aug 11 12:36:04 2005
# Current time GMT: Thu Aug 11 19:36:04 2005
# Using Test.pm version 1.25
# Using Apac
18 matches
Mail list logo